H.A. et al v. New York City Department of Education et al

Filing 26

ORDER: ORDERED that in support of their application, by January 18, 2022, the parties shall jointly file a proposed schedule outlining interim steps to be taken during the stay, including the production of documents pertinent to settlement, and any other steps to be taken during the proposed stay period. The proposed schedule should illustrate why ninety days are necessary if the parties proceed diligently. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 1/11/2022) (rro)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-cv-04389-LGS Document 26 Filed 01/11/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X : H.A. et al., : Plaintiff. : : -against: : NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF : EDUCATION et al., : Defendants. X ------------------------------------------------------------- 21 Civ. 4389 (LGS) ORDER LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, per the Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order dated August 24, 2021, fact discovery is scheduled to close on January 11, 2022 (Dkt. No. 23). WHEREAS, on January 10, 2022, the parties filed a request to stay discovery, or in the alternative, extend discovery for ninety days. WHEREAS, the parties’ application for an extension is untimely per the Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, and does not comply with the Court’s Individual Rules. It is hereby ORDERED that in support of their application, by January 18, 2022, the parties shall jointly file a proposed schedule outlining interim steps to be taken during the stay, including the production of documents pertinent to settlement, and any other steps to be taken during the proposed stay period. The proposed schedule should illustrate why ninety days are necessary if the parties proceed diligently. Dated: January 11, 2022 New York, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?