Perez v. Oxford University et al
Filing 90
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 89 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations in favor of Astra Zeneca LP, Astrazeneca AB, Astrazeneca UK Limited, Oxford University, Mark J. Mulligan, Martina A. Parauda, Melanie Jay, Michael J. Missa against Eric And rew Perez. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated May 10, 2022, Judge Lehrburger's R&R is adopted in full. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice to him re-filing it in the proper jurisdiction. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purposes of an appeal. See Co ppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a non-frivolous issue); accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 5/10/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
