Aritomo et al v. Rhee et al

Filing 23

ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' September 3, 2021 joint letter and proposed scheduling order. See Dkts. 21, 22. The parties' proposed case management plan is tethered to the Court's decision on Defendants' pendin g motion to dismiss, with all discovery deadlines set for a certain period of time following the Court's decision. The parties further report that no fruitful settlement discussions can take place until after resolution of the motion to dism iss. Accordingly, the initial pretrial conference scheduled for September 10, 2021 is hereby adjourned sine die. If the case is to proceed following the Court's decision on the motion, the conference will be promptly rescheduled at that point, and the Court will direct the parties to submit a revised scheduling order. If the parties wish to discuss any issues with the Court prior to resolution of the pending motion, they may of course file a letter requesting a conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 9/7/2021) (rj)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-cv-04875-RA Document 23 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK USDC-SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: DATE FILED: 09/07/2021 KEICHI ARITOMO and JOY ZHANG, Plaintiff, No. 21-CV-4875 (RA) v. YOUNGJOO (“JULIA”) RHEE; ALEKSEY IGUDESMAN; and MUSIC TRAVELER Gmbh, ORDER Defendants. RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties’ September 3, 2021 joint letter and proposed scheduling order. See Dkts. 21, 22. The parties’ proposed case management plan is tethered to the Court’s decision on Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss, with all discovery deadlines set for a certain period of time following the Court’s decision. The parties further report that no fruitful settlement discussions can take place until after resolution of the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the initial pretrial conference scheduled for September 10, 2021 is hereby adjourned sine die. If the case is to proceed following the Court’s decision on the motion, the conference will be promptly rescheduled at that point, and the Court will direct the parties to submit a revised scheduling order. If the parties wish to discuss any issues with the Court prior to resolution of the pending motion, they may of course file a letter requesting a conference. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 7, 2021 New York, New York Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?