Aritomo et al v. Rhee et al
Filing
23
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' September 3, 2021 joint letter and proposed scheduling order. See Dkts. 21, 22. The parties' proposed case management plan is tethered to the Court's decision on Defendants' pendin g motion to dismiss, with all discovery deadlines set for a certain period of time following the Court's decision. The parties further report that no fruitful settlement discussions can take place until after resolution of the motion to dism iss. Accordingly, the initial pretrial conference scheduled for September 10, 2021 is hereby adjourned sine die. If the case is to proceed following the Court's decision on the motion, the conference will be promptly rescheduled at that point, and the Court will direct the parties to submit a revised scheduling order. If the parties wish to discuss any issues with the Court prior to resolution of the pending motion, they may of course file a letter requesting a conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 9/7/2021) (rj)
Case 1:21-cv-04875-RA Document 23 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
USDC-SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 09/07/2021
KEICHI ARITOMO and JOY ZHANG,
Plaintiff,
No. 21-CV-4875 (RA)
v.
YOUNGJOO (“JULIA”) RHEE; ALEKSEY
IGUDESMAN; and MUSIC TRAVELER
Gmbh,
ORDER
Defendants.
RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:
The Court is in receipt of the parties’ September 3, 2021 joint letter and proposed scheduling
order. See Dkts. 21, 22. The parties’ proposed case management plan is tethered to the Court’s
decision on Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss, with all discovery deadlines set for a certain
period of time following the Court’s decision. The parties further report that no fruitful settlement
discussions can take place until after resolution of the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the initial
pretrial conference scheduled for September 10, 2021 is hereby adjourned sine die. If the case is to
proceed following the Court’s decision on the motion, the conference will be promptly rescheduled at
that point, and the Court will direct the parties to submit a revised scheduling order. If the parties
wish to discuss any issues with the Court prior to resolution of the pending motion, they may of
course file a letter requesting a conference.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 7, 2021
New York, New York
Ronnie Abrams
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?