ABC v. DEF

Filing 138

ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to submit a status letter to the Court updating it on Plaintiff's proposal regarding next steps by no later than January 2, 2024. Plaintiff's counsel is instructed to serve this order on Defendants and to retain proof of service. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 12/13/2023) (rro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------- X : SMART STUDY CO., LTD., : : Plaintiff, : : -against: : ACUTEYE-US, et al., : : Defendants. : ------------------------------------------------------------------------ X USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: 12/13/2023 1:21-cv-5860-GHW ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: On November 20, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to serve process in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f). Dkt. No. 135. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s response at Dkt. No. 137. The Court had expected that Plaintiff would allow dismissal of these parties based on the Court’s prior opinion in this case, Dkt. No. 100, the substance of which the Court affirmed at the October 25, 2023 show-cause hearing, see Dkt. No. 127. But the Court understands that Plaintiff does not wish for dismissal of the remaining defendants at this time based on Rule 4. As a result, the Court’s November 20, 2023 order to show cause, Dkt. No. 135, is withdrawn. Plaintiff is directed to submit a status letter to the Court updating it on Plaintiff’s proposal regarding next steps by no later than January 2, 2024. Plaintiff’s counsel is instructed to serve this order on Defendants and to retain proof of service. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 13, 2023 New York, New York _____________________________________ GREGORY H. WOODS United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?