ABC v. DEF
Filing
138
ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to submit a status letter to the Court updating it on Plaintiff's proposal regarding next steps by no later than January 2, 2024. Plaintiff's counsel is instructed to serve this order on Defendants and to retain proof of service. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 12/13/2023) (rro)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
SMART STUDY CO., LTD.,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-against:
:
ACUTEYE-US, et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
------------------------------------------------------------------------ X
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #: _________________
DATE FILED: 12/13/2023
1:21-cv-5860-GHW
ORDER
GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:
On November 20, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause as to why this action
should not be dismissed for failure to serve process in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 4(f). Dkt. No. 135. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s response at Dkt. No. 137.
The Court had expected that Plaintiff would allow dismissal of these parties based on the
Court’s prior opinion in this case, Dkt. No. 100, the substance of which the Court affirmed at the
October 25, 2023 show-cause hearing, see Dkt. No. 127. But the Court understands that Plaintiff
does not wish for dismissal of the remaining defendants at this time based on Rule 4. As a result,
the Court’s November 20, 2023 order to show cause, Dkt. No. 135, is withdrawn.
Plaintiff is directed to submit a status letter to the Court updating it on Plaintiff’s proposal
regarding next steps by no later than January 2, 2024.
Plaintiff’s counsel is instructed to serve this order on Defendants and to retain proof of
service.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 13, 2023
New York, New York
_____________________________________
GREGORY H. WOODS
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?