SingularDTV GmbH v. Doe

Filing 47

MEMO ENDORSEMENT with respect to 44 Motion to Compel. ENDORSEMENT: Binance Holdings Limited must respond to Plaintiff's motion to compel not later than May 30, 2022. Plaintiff must reply not later than June 6, 2022. Plaintiff must serve this order on Binance and post proof of service on the Docket not later than May 11, 2022. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 5/9/2022) (kv)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-cv-06000-VEC Document 43-1 Filed 05/09/22 Page 11of 21 Case 1:21-cv-06000-VEC Document 47 Filed 05/06/22 Page of MEMO ENDORSED USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED: SINGULAR DTV GmbH, Plaintiff, NOTICE OF MOTION v. Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-06000-VEC JOHN DOE, Defendant. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and supported by the accompanying Memorandum of Law and the Declaration of Jerald M. Tenenbaum, Plaintiff, SingularDTV GmbH, will move this Court at the United States Courthouse for the District Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY, before the Honorable Valerie Figuerdo, United States Magistrate Judge, for an order compelling compliance with Subpoena to Binance Holdings Limited. Plaintiff hereby certifies that the parties have met and conferred in good faith via telephone and e-mail in compliance with FRCP 37(a)(1) regarding the relief sought in this motion, and counsel for Binance has not agreed to the relief sought herein. Dated: May 6, 2022 New York, NY MORRISON TENENBAUM PLLC By: /s/ Jerald Tenenbaum Jerald M. Tenenbaum 87 Walker Street, Second Flr. New York, NY 10013 Tel.: (212) 620 0938 E-Mail: Attorneys for Plaintiff Case 1:21-cv-06000-VEC Document 47 Filed 05/09/22 Page 2 of 2 SO ORDERED. HON. VALERIE CAPRONI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?