Nam v. Permanent Mission of the Republic of Korea to the United Nations et al

Filing 83

ORDER SETTING FORTH BRIEFING SCHEDULE: IT IS ON THIS 2nd day of August 2022, ORDERED: - Plaintiff and Defendant shall each submit their respective opposition to the other party's motion for summary judgment by August 29, 2022; - Plaintiff an d Defendant shall each submit their respective reply to the other party's foregoing opposition by September 19, 2022; IT IS SO ORDERED. ( Responses due by 8/29/2022, Replies due by 9/19/2022.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/2/2022) (ate)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-cv-06165-RA Document 83 Filed 08/02/22 Page 1 of 3 2nd August 2, 2022 Case 1:21-cv-06165-RA Document 83 Filed 08/02/22 Page 2 of 3 8/1/2022 Case 1:21-cv-06165-RA Document 83 Filed 08/02/22 Page 3 of 3 HENRY L. KIM* JOSHUA S. LIM* KENDAL SIM* SEAN S. KWAK* NICHOLAS J. DUBOIS* JOHN CHEN* NY Office: 164-01 Northern Boulevard 2nd Floor Flushing, NY 11358 F: 877.833.2007 _______________________ Reply to NJ Address only OF COUNSEL CRAIG A. BORGEN**♦ ______________________ * ** ♦ Admitted in NJ & NY Admitted in CA, NJ, NY & PA Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Civil Trial Attorney 460 Bergen Boulevard, Suite 305, Palisades Park, NJ 07650 T: 201.585.7400 F: 201.585.7422 August 1, 2022 Via ECF only Southern District of New York Attn: Hon. Ronnie Abrams, U.S.D.J. 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 1506 New York, New York 10007 RE: HYUNHUY NAM v. PERMANENT MISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA TO THE UNITED NATIONS, et al. CASE NO.: 1:21-cv-6165-RA REQUEST FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Dear Judge Abrams: As Your Honor is aware, this firm represents the defendant, the Permanent Mission of the Republic of Korea to the United Nations (“Mission” or “Defendant”), in the above-referenced matter. Defendant writes with the consent of Plaintiff’s counsel to respectfully request that the Court issue an order setting forth the briefing schedule for the parties’ respective motion for summary judgment, both filed on July 28, 2022. The parties have conferred and agreed to the following: - The parties’ respective motions for summary judgment due July 28, 2022 (past) The parties’ respective oppositions due August 29, 2022; and The parties’ respective replies due September 19, 2022. A proposed form of order setting forth the foregoing briefing schedule is annexed hereto. Thank you, Your Honor, for your time and attention in this matter. Respectfully yours, /s/ Joshua S. Lim Joshua S. Lim JSL/ssk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?