IN RE: IBM ARBITRATION AGREEMENT LITIGATION

Filing 78

ORDER: WHEREAS, on December 9, 2021, District Judge Furman entered an order directing Plaintiffs to provide Defendant by December 16, 2021, any proposed amended pleadings for review; WHEREAS, the December 9, 2021 order also directed the parties t o "confer regarding whether IBM will oppose any motion to file [Plaintiffs' proposed] amended pleadings" and to "submit to the court their joint or separate proposals for the briefing of any such motions" for leave to ame nd; WHEREAS, on December 16, 2021, Plaintiffs provided to Defendant for review the proposed amended complaint of Plaintiff William Abt; WHEREAS, Defendant opposes the filing of the proposed amended complaint. WHEREAS, the parties have c onferred and agreed to the following briefing schedule for Plaintiff Abt's anticipated Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 motion for leave to amend: Service and filing of Plaintiff Abt's motion for leave to amend and supporting memorandum of law due J anuary 14, 2022; Service and filing of Defendant's memorandum of law in opposition to motion for leave to amend due January 28, 2022; Service and filing of Plaintiff Abt's reply memorandum of law in support of motion for leave to amend due February 4, 2022. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 1/14/2022., Responses due by 1/28/2022, Replies due by 2/4/2022.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/3/2022) (vfr)

Case 1:21-cv-06296-JMF Document 78 Filed 01/03/22 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case No. 1:21-cv-06296-JMF
IN RE:
IBM ARBITRATION AGREEMENT
LITIGATION

ECF Case
[PROPOSED] ORDER

WHEREAS, on December 9, 2021, District Judge Furman entered an order directing
Plaintiffs to provide Defendant by December 16, 2021, any proposed amended pleadings for
review;
WHEREAS, the December 9, 2021 order also directed the parties to “confer regarding
whether IBM will oppose any motion to file [Plaintiffs’ proposed] amended pleadings” and to
“submit to the court their joint or separate proposals for the briefing of any such motions” for
leave to amend;
WHEREAS, on December 16, 2021, Plaintiffs provided to Defendant for review the
proposed amended complaint of Plaintiff William Abt;
WHEREAS, Defendant opposes the filing of the proposed amended complaint
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed to the following briefing schedule for
Plaintiff Abt’s anticipated Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 motion for leave to amend:
Date
January 14, 2022
January 28, 2022
February 4, 2022

Deadline
Service and filing of Plaintiff Abt’s motion
for leave to amend and supporting
memorandum of law
Service and filing of Defendant’s
memorandum of law in opposition to motion
for leave to amend
Service and filing of Plaintiff Abt’s reply
memorandum of law in support of motion for
leave to amend

SO ORDERED
January 3, 2022
Dated: ________________
New York, New York

____________________________
Hon. Jesse M. Furman
United States District Judge

Case 1:21-cv-06296-JMF Document 78 Filed 01/03/22 Page 2 of 2

Agreed:
s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]

s/ Matthew W. Lampe
Matthew W. Lampe
JONES DAY
250 Vesey Street
New York, New York 10281
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

Attorney for Plaintiffs
Attorney for Defendant
International Business Machines Corp.