Lohnn v. International Business Machines Corp.

Filing 53

ORDER: Accordingly, by February 11, 2022, the parties are directed to file on the public docket the following documents with limited redactions according to the Court's January 4, 2022 Memorandum and Order: Plaintiff: Plaintiff' s Motion for Summary Judgment (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 44-1) [originally filed under seal at Dkt. No. 14 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 17]; Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts In Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 44-2) [originally filed under seal at Dkt. No. 15 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 18]; Plaintiff's Reply In Support of Her Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to IBM's Cross-Motion to Dis miss (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 44-4) [originally filed under seal at Dkt. No. 32 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 36]. Defendant: Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts In Support of Motion for S ummary Judgment (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 45-1) [originally filed under seal at Dkt. No. 28 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 29] The Court will address in a separate order the proposed redactions to the declarations of Shannon Liss-Riordan and the exhibits to those declarations. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 2/11/2022. Responses due by 2/11/2022.) (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/10/2022) (va)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-cv-06379-LJL Document 53 Filed 02/10/22 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : DENISE LOHNN, Executor of the Estate of Jorgen : Lohnn, Deceased, : : Plaintiff, : : -v: : INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP., : : Defendant. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X 02/10/2022 21-cv-6379 (LJL) ORDER LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: On January 4, 2022, the Court filed its Memorandum and Order regarding the various sealing motions on the docket. Dkt. No. 42. On January 6, 2022, Defendant filed a notice of interlocutory appeal. Dkt. No. 43. On January 12, 2022, the Second Circuit granted a temporary administrative stay pending decision on Defendant-Appellant’s motion for a stay pending appeal and Plaintiff-Appellee’s cross-motion to dismiss the appeal. Dkt. No. 46. On February 8, 2022, the Second Circuit terminated the administrative stay entered on January 12, 2022, denied Defendant-Appellant’s motion for a stay pending appeal, and denied Plaintiff-Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 52. Accordingly, by February 11, 2022, the parties are directed to file on the public docket the following documents with limited redactions according to the Court’s January 4, 2022 Memorandum and Order: Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 44-1) [originally filed under seal at Dkt. No. 14 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 17] Plaintiff’s Statement of Material Facts In Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 44-2) [originally filed under seal at Dkt. No. 15 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 18] Plaintiff’s Reply In Support of Her Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to IBM’s Cross-Motion to Dismiss (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 44-4) [originally filed under seal at Dkt. No. 32 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 36] Defendant Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Statement of Material Facts In Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 45-1) [originally filed under Case 1:21-cv-06379-LJL Document 53 Filed 02/10/22 Page 2 of 2 seal at Dkt. No. 28 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 29] The Court will address in a separate order the proposed redactions to the declarations of Shannon Liss-Riordan and the exhibits to those declarations. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 10, 2022 New York, New York __________________________________ LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?