Lohnn v. International Business Machines Corp.
Filing
53
ORDER: Accordingly, by February 11, 2022, the parties are directed to file on the public docket the following documents with limited redactions according to the Court's January 4, 2022 Memorandum and Order: Plaintiff: Plaintiff' s Motion for Summary Judgment (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 44-1) [originally filed under seal at Dkt. No. 14 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 17]; Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts In Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 44-2) [originally filed under seal at Dkt. No. 15 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 18]; Plaintiff's Reply In Support of Her Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to IBM's Cross-Motion to Dis miss (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 44-4) [originally filed under seal at Dkt. No. 32 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 36]. Defendant: Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts In Support of Motion for S ummary Judgment (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 45-1) [originally filed under seal at Dkt. No. 28 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 29] The Court will address in a separate order the proposed redactions to the declarations of Shannon Liss-Riordan and the exhibits to those declarations. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 2/11/2022. Responses due by 2/11/2022.) (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/10/2022) (va)
Case 1:21-cv-06379-LJL Document 53 Filed 02/10/22 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
DENISE LOHNN, Executor of the Estate of Jorgen
:
Lohnn, Deceased,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-v:
:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.,
:
:
Defendant.
:
:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
02/10/2022
21-cv-6379 (LJL)
ORDER
LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge:
On January 4, 2022, the Court filed its Memorandum and Order regarding the various
sealing motions on the docket. Dkt. No. 42. On January 6, 2022, Defendant filed a notice of
interlocutory appeal. Dkt. No. 43. On January 12, 2022, the Second Circuit granted a temporary
administrative stay pending decision on Defendant-Appellant’s motion for a stay pending appeal
and Plaintiff-Appellee’s cross-motion to dismiss the appeal. Dkt. No. 46.
On February 8, 2022, the Second Circuit terminated the administrative stay entered on
January 12, 2022, denied Defendant-Appellant’s motion for a stay pending appeal, and denied
Plaintiff-Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 52.
Accordingly, by February 11, 2022, the parties are directed to file on the public docket
the following documents with limited redactions according to the Court’s January 4, 2022
Memorandum and Order:
Plaintiff
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 44-1)
[originally filed under seal at Dkt. No. 14 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 17]
Plaintiff’s Statement of Material Facts In Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
(as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 44-2) [originally filed under seal at Dkt. No. 15 and
filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 18]
Plaintiff’s Reply In Support of Her Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to
IBM’s Cross-Motion to Dismiss (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 44-4) [originally filed
under seal at Dkt. No. 32 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 36]
Defendant
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Statement of Material Facts In Support of Motion
for Summary Judgment (as filed under seal at Dkt. No. 45-1) [originally filed under
Case 1:21-cv-06379-LJL Document 53 Filed 02/10/22 Page 2 of 2
seal at Dkt. No. 28 and filed with redactions at Dkt. No. 29]
The Court will address in a separate order the proposed redactions to the declarations of
Shannon Liss-Riordan and the exhibits to those declarations.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 10, 2022
New York, New York
__________________________________
LEWIS J. LIMAN
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?