Graciano v. Bigmouth Inc. et al

Filing 13

ORDER: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be cons ummated within forty-five(45) days of the date hereof. Any application to reopen must be led within forty-five (45) days of this Order; any application to reopen led thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised tha t if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within thenext forty-five (45) days with a request that the agreement be "so ordered" by the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 1/07/2022) (ama)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-cv-06712-ER Document 13 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SANDY GRACIANO, Plaintiff, – against – ORDER 21 Civ. 6712 (ER) BIGMOUTH, INC., and BIGMOUTH LLC, Defendants. Ramos, D.J.: �e Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within forty-five (45) days of the date hereof. Any application to reopen must be filed within forty-five (45) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next forty-five (45) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 7, 2022 New York, New York Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?