Donoghue v. Gad et al
Filing
57
ORDER granting 53 Motion to Substitute Party. Because all three conditions are met, Plaintiff's motion to substitute is GRANTED. See Savior v. Bastedo, 623 F.2d 230, 237 (2d Cir.1980) ("[I]t is difficult to imagine a case where discre tion might properly be exercised to deny a motion to substitute for a deceased plaintiff made within the rule's time limits."). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 53 and to substitute Mr. Donoghue as Plaintiff in this action. SO ORDERED. Dennis J. Donoghue added. Deborah Donoghue terminated. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 11/17/2022) (va)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
DEBORAH DONOGHUE,
Plaintiff,
-v.Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
Nominal Defendant,
21 Civ. 7182 (KPF)
ORDER
-andTHOMAS GAD,
Defendant,
KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge:
Deborah Donoghue initiated this shareholder action against Thomas
Gad on August 25, 2021, on behalf of nominal defendant Y-mAbs
Therapeutics, Inc. (Dkt. #1). On September 21, 2021, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a
suggestion of death notifying the Court that Ms. Donoghue passed away during
the pendency of this litigation. (Dkt. #43). A motion to substitute Dennis
Donoghue, Ms. Donoghue’s spouse and the Administrator with Limitations of
her non-probate estate, as plaintiff in this action, followed on November 7,
2022. (Dkt. #53). Neither Gad nor Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc. opposes the
motion. (Dkt. #56). For the reasons that follow, the motion to substitute is
GRANTED.
DISCUSSION
A.
Applicable Law
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1) governs motions for substitution
based on the death of a party. It provides:
If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the
court may order substitution of the proper party. A
motion for substitution may be made by any party or by
the decedent's successor or representative. If the motion
is not made within 90 days after service of a statement
noting the death, the action by or against the decedent
must be dismissed.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). To succeed on a motion for substitution, the movant
must establish that: “(i) the motion is timely; (ii) the movant's claims have not
been extinguished by the death; and (iii) the movant proposed a proper party
for substitution.” Adler v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 13 Civ. 4866 (VB), 2015 WL
2330171, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2015).
B.
Analysis
Mr. Donoghue’s submissions satisfy all three requirements of Rule
25(a)(1). First, his motion is timely. Plaintiff’s counsel advised the Court of Ms.
Donoghue’s passing on September 21, 2022. (Dkt. 43). The instant motion
was filed on November 7, 2022, (Dkt. #53), well within the 90-day window
permitted by the Rule. Second, Ms. Donoghue’s claims were not extinguished
by her death. “An action under Section 16(b) of the [Securities Exchange] Act,
for the recovery of insider profits, may survive the death of a party.” Morales v.
CT Holdings, Inc., No. 01 Civ. 1303 (KMW) (KNF), 2011 WL 1329117, at *2
(S.D.N.Y. Oct. 29, 2001) (citing Stull v. Green, No. 69 Civ. 440 (MEL), 1971 WL
2
259, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 20, 1971)). And finally, as Administrator of Ms.
Donoghue’s estate, Mr. Donoghue is a proper party for substitution. See Adler,
2015 WL 2330171, at *2 (“A proper party for substitution is either
a representative of the deceased party's estate or a successor of the deceased
party.” (quotation omitted)); see also Dkt. #55-2, 55-3 (Westchester County
Surrogate’s Court documents appointing Mr. Donoghue administrator).
Because all three conditions are met, Plaintiff’s motion to substitute is
GRANTED. See Savior v. Bastedo, 623 F.2d 230, 237 (2d Cir.1980) (“[I]t is
difficult to imagine a case where discretion might properly be exercised to deny
a motion to substitute for a deceased plaintiff made within the rule's time
limits.”). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry
53 and to substitute Mr. Donoghue as Plaintiff in this action.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 17, 2022
New York, New York
KATHERINE POLK FAILLA
United States District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?