Herrera et al v. New York City Department of Education et al

Filing 89

ORDER OF DISMISSAL... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned actionis discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settleme nt in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by May 23, 2024. If no such application is made by that date, todays dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). All other dates and deadlines, including the upcoming trial, are ADJOURNED sine die.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 4/23/24) (yv) Modified on 4/24/2024 (yv).

USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 4/23/2024

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LOIS HERRERA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

1:21-cv-7555-MKV

-against-

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION and RICHARD CARRANZA,
Defendants.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:

The Court has been informed by the Magistrate Judge that the parties have reached a
settlement in principle. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action
is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this
Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as
the application to restore the action is made by May 23, 2024. If no such application is made by
that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand,
Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). All other dates and deadlines, including the upcoming
trial, are ADJOURNED sine die.
SO ORDERED.
Date: April 23, 2024
New York, NY

_________________________________
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
United States District Judge