Securities and Exchange Commission v. Thurlow et al
Filing
104
AMENDED ORDER: Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that Defendants R. Fidler, B. Fidler, B. Boucher and a representative of Defendant Western Bankers Capital shall appear for a hearing on this matter on December 10, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 518 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007. Counsel for Plaintiff Securities and ExchangeCommission shall also appear at the hearing. R. Fidler shall be prepared to testify and present argument as to why re presenting his co-defendants does not or will not violate Rules 1.7 and 3.7 of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct. B. Fidler; B. Boucher; and the Western Bankers Capital representative shall be prepared to testify as to their knowledge of an d agreements to waive these actual or potential conflicts of interest. Counsel for Plaintiff may present argument in support of their position regarding actual or potential conflicts of interest in this case. No other party or counsel need appear at the hearing, however, they may request a dial-in number by emailing BroderickNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov no later than December 9, 2024 at 12:00 p.m. local time. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 11/22/2024) (sgz)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
----------------------------------------------------------X
:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
:
COMMISSION,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-against:
:
SIMON PIERS THURLOW, et al.,
:
:
Defendants. X
---------------------------------------------------------
21-CV-7700 (VSB) (SN)
AMENDED ORDER
VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge:
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a), this Order amends the Order issued on
October 28, 2024. (Doc. 91.)
On September 5, 2024, I issued an Opinion & Order in which I sua sponte raised whether
Defendant R. Fidler’s representation of his co-defendants presented an actual or potential
conflict of interest. (Doc. 51.) In response, R. Fidler withdrew his representation of certain
Defendants. (Doc. 80.) R. Fidler now represents Defendants B. Fidler, B. Boucher, and Western
Bankers Capital Inc., and has submitted conflict waivers on these Defendants’ behalf. (See Doc.
78.) Plaintiff argues that I should nonetheless disqualify R. Fidler from representing B. Fidler,
B. Boucher, and Western Bankers Capital Inc., as the allegations in the complaint suggest that R.
Fidler’s interests in this litigation are or will become adverse to the co-defendants he represents.
(See Doc. 85.)
I find that R. Fidler’s submissions are insufficient to demonstrate that disqualification is
unwarranted. Accordingly, it is hereby:
ORDERED that Defendants R. Fidler, B. Fidler, B. Boucher and a representative of
Defendant Western Bankers Capital shall appear for a hearing on this matter on December 10,
2024 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 518 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40
Foley Square, New York, NY 10007. Counsel for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange
Commission shall also appear at the hearing. R. Fidler shall be prepared to testify and present
argument as to why representing his co-defendants does not or will not violate Rules 1.7 and 3.7
of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct. B. Fidler; B. Boucher; and the Western
Bankers Capital representative shall be prepared to testify as to their knowledge of and
agreements to waive these actual or potential conflicts of interest. Counsel for Plaintiff may
present argument in support of their position regarding actual or potential conflicts of interest in
this case.
No other party or counsel need appear at the hearing, however, they may request a dial-in
number by emailing BroderickNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov no later than December 9,
2024 at 12:00 p.m. local time.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 22, 2024
New York, New York
______________________
Vernon S. Broderick
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?