Garg v. Wang
Filing
7
ORDER: On November 17, 2021, plaintiff filed a letter-motion seeking judicial approval to serve the Complaint and Summons on defendant by alternative means pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). (Dkt. No. 5.) It is hereby ORDERED that (1) plaintiff shall serve his letter-motion on defendant's New York counsel, Charles J. Borrero, Esq., and defendant's Singapore counsel, Stephenson Harwood LLP, by email, and file proof of such service on the docket; (2) defendant shall file his opposition to plaintiff's letter-motion, if any, no later than one week from the date of such service; and (3) plaintiff shale file his reply to defendant's opposition, if any, no later than two days from the date of defendant's opposition. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 11/18/2021) (rro)
Case 1:21-cv-07716-JPO Document 7 Filed 11/18/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
11/18/2021
VIJAY GARG,
Plaintiff,
21-CV-7716 (JPO) (BCM)
v.
ORDER
KEN ZI WANG,
Defendant.
BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge.
On November 17, 2021, plaintiff filed a letter-motion seeking judicial approval to serve
the Complaint and Summons on defendant by alternative means pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3).
(Dkt. No. 5.) It is hereby ORDERED that (1) plaintiff shall serve his letter-motion on defendant's
New York counsel, Charles J. Borrero, Esq., and defendant's Singapore counsel, Stephenson
Harwood LLP, by email, and file proof of such service on the docket; (2) defendant shall file his
opposition to plaintiff's letter-motion, if any, no later than one week from the date of such
service; and (3) plaintiff shale file his reply to defendant's opposition, if any, no later than two
days from the date of defendant's opposition.
Dated: November 18, 2021
New York, New York
SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
BARBARA MOSES
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?