Kennedy v. Guiding Eyes for the Blind
Filing
7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/16/2021) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
Case 1:21-cv-07977-LTS Document 7 Filed 11/16/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
CHRISTINA KENNEDY,
Plaintiff,
-againstGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND,
21-CV-7977 (LTS)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Defendant.
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:
By order dated October 4, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit
a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) or pay the $402.00 in fees
required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would
result in dismissal of the complaint. On October 6, 2021, Plaintiff filed a letter informing the
Court that Senator Schumer told her that her dogs are being starved and then shot, and that the
National Security Agency told her that Defendant is using a torture sheet prepared by John
Roberts, with the starving idea coming from a sheriff’s deputy. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff ends her
letter with the following sentence, “I pay no fees for this under the law,” but Plaintiff has not
filed an IFP application or paid the fees, as directed by the Court’s October 4, 2021 order.
Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would
not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf.
Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates
good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).
Case 1:21-cv-07977-LTS Document 7 Filed 11/16/21 Page 2 of 2
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on
the docket.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 16, 2021
New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN
Chief United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?