Cochran et al v. The Owner(s) of the name brand Toothpaste Close-Up

Filing 5

CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff Cochran's failure to pay the $402.00 in filing fees or submit an amended request to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/17/2021) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

Case 1:21-cv-08072-LTS Document 5 Filed 11/17/21 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JOSEPH MELVIN COCHRAN; RAUL W.
SANTIAGO BRITO,1
Plaintiffs,
21-CV-8072 (LTS)

-againstTHE OWNER(S) OF THE NAME BRAND
TOOTHPASTE “CLOSE-UP”/ AND THEIR
COMPANIES, ETC.,

CIVIL JUDGMENT

Defendants.
Pursuant to the order issued November 17, 2021, dismissing the complaint,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed without
prejudice for Plaintiff Cochran’s failure to pay the $402.00 in filing fees or submit an amended
request to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court’s
judgment would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to
Plaintiff and note service on the docket.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 17, 2021
New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN
Chief United States District Judge

1

In the November 17, 2021 order dismissing the complaint, the Court construed the
complaint as asserting claims solely on behalf of Plaintiff Cochran, the only person who signed
the complaint.