Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership et al v. Qin
Filing
419
ORDER: Accordingly, the Court hereby STAYS this action pending the Court of Appeals' determination of Ms. Liu's appeal of this Court's Orders dated January 24, 2024 (Dkt. #365), and September 29, 2023 (Dkt. #296). Counsel for Ms. Liu is directed to advise the Court, within two days, of the resolution of that appeal or any significant development in that appeal. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 3/26/2024) (rro)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
HUZHOU CHUANGTAI RONGYUAN INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIP, HUZHOU
HUIHENGYING EQUITY INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP,
and HUZHOU HUIRONGSHENG EQUITY INVESTMENT
PARTNERSHIP,
21 Civ. 9221 (KPF)
Petitioners,
-v.-
ORDER
HUI QIN,
Respondent.
KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge:
On March 25, 2024, the Court received the Order of the United
States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granting Appellant Ms.
Liu’s motion to stay the post-judgment document discovery ordered by
this Court in its January 24, 2024 Order (Dkt. #365), pending that
Court’s review of her appeal (Dkt. #418).
The Court wishes to assess the sufficiency of Ms. Liu’s production
of documents, particularly as such a production would impact
Petitioners’ ability to enforce the judgment in this matter, before making
a determination on Petitioners’ Renewed Motion to Compel, for
Sanctions, and for an Order for Civil Contempt as to Respondent. (Dkt.
#172). Accordingly, the Court hereby STAYS this action pending the
Court of Appeals’ determination of Ms. Liu’s appeal of this Court’s Orders
dated January 24, 2024 (Dkt. #365), and September 29, 2023 (Dkt.
#296). Counsel for Ms. Liu is directed to advise the Court, within two
days, of the resolution of that appeal or any significant development in
that appeal.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 26, 2024
New York, New York
KATHERINE POLK FAILLA
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?