Jimenez v. Bogoto Realty Inc. et al

Filing 63

ORDER denying without prejudice 59 Letter Motion to Compel; denying without prejudice 61 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document. The Court has reviewed the letters docketed as Dkt. No. 59 and Dkt. No. 61. The Court is not convinced that suff icient communications have taken place between counsel. Thus, all requests for relief in these letters are DENIED without prejudice. By May 13, 2022, the parties shall meet and confer in good faith in an effort to resolve the dispute. In the event t hat a pre-motion letter is still warranted, by May 17, 2022, the parties shall file any such letter in accordance with the Court's Individual Rule III.C.3, with any response due by May 23, 2022.The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motions at Dkt. No. 59 and 61. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 5/9/2022) (mml)

Case 1:21-cv-09664-LGS Document 63 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 1

PARKER HANSKI LLC
40 WORTH STREET, SUITE 602
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10013
PHONE: [phone]
FAX:
212.248.5600

May 6, 2022
Via ECF
The Honorable Lorna G. Schofield
United States District Judge
United States District Court
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re:

Iris Jimenez v. Bogoto Realty Inc., et al., No. 21-cv-9664 (LGS)(SLC)

Dear Judge Schofield:
We represent the plaintiff in the above-entitled action. We write to advise the Court that
plaintiff intends to respond to defendants Bogoto Realty, Inc’s. (“Bogoto”) and Farview, Inc.’s
(“Farview”) current letter (ECF Docket # 59), and respectfully requests the Court to allow
plaintiff the opportunity to submit a response on or before Monday, May 9, 2022, before issuing
a determination. In the alternative plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court Order defendants
Bogoto and Farview, to meet and confer in good faith1 with plaintiff regarding their current
discovery dispute, and should the dispute not be resolved, permit plaintiff to file her response
within two (2) business days thereafter.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. With kindest regards, I am
very truly yours,
/s/
Robert G. Hanski, Esq.
The Court has reviewed the letters docketed as Dkt. No. 59 and Dkt. No. 61. The Court is not convinced that
sufficient communications have taken place between counsel. Thus, all requests for relief in these letters
are DENIED without prejudice.

By May 13, 2022, the parties shall meet and confer in good faith in an effort to resolve the dispute. In the
event that a pre-motion letter is still warranted, by May 17, 2022, the parties shall file any such letter in
accordance with the Court's Individual Rule III.C.3, with any response due by May 23, 2022.
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motions at Dkt. No. 59 and 61.
Dated: May 9, 2022
New York, New York

1

As per this Court’s Individual Rules and Procedures for Civil Cases at III.c.3.

1