Jenkins v. NYCHA

Filing 22

ORDER: On March 15, 2022, the Court set the following briefing schedule for Defendant's motion to dismiss: Defendant's motion due April 15, 2022; Plaintiff's opposition due May 16, 2022; Defendant's reply due May 31, 2022. (ECF No. 16.) Defendant NYCHA filed its motion to dismiss on April 6, 2022. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition. In light of Plaintiff's pro se status, the Court grants Plaintiff an extension nunc pro tunc to file an oppositio n to Defendant's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants motion to dismiss is now due on Tuesday, August 23, 2022. Defendant's reply is due Tuesday, September 6, 2022. If Plaintiff does not file an opposition by Augu st 23, 2022, the Court will decide the motion to dismiss unopposed. Plaintiff is reminded that she may review the numerous resources available to pro se litigants at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/prose. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of this order to the pro se Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. ( Responses due by 8/23/2022, Replies due by 9/6/2022.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 8/2/2022) (vfr)

Case 1:21-cv-10364-AT-KHP Document 22 Filed 08/02/22 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

8/2/2022

ARLENE JENKINS,
Plaintiff,

ORDER

-againstNYCHA and JOHN DOE,

21-CV-10364 (AT) (KHP)
Defendants.

KATHARINE H. PARKER, United States Magistrate Judge.
On March 15, 2022, the Court set the following briefing schedule for Defendant’s
motion to dismiss: Defendant’s motion due April 15, 2022; Plaintiff’s opposition due May 16,
2022; Defendant’s reply due May 31, 2022. (ECF No. 16.)
Defendant NYCHA filed its motion to dismiss on April 6, 2022. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff did
not file an opposition.
In light of Plaintiff’s pro se status, the Court grants Plaintiff an extension nunc pro tunc
to file an opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s
motion to dismiss is now due on Tuesday, August 23, 2022. Defendant’s reply is due Tuesday,
September 6, 2022. If Plaintiff does not file an opposition by August 23, 2022, the Court will
decide the motion to dismiss unopposed.
Plaintiff is reminded that she may review the numerous resources available to pro se
litigants at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/prose.
The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of this order to the pro se
Plaintiff.

Case 1:21-cv-10364-AT-KHP Document 22 Filed 08/02/22 Page 2 of 2

Dated: New York, New York
August 2, 2022

SO ORDERED.
________________________________
KATHARINE H. PARKER
United States Magistrate Judge

2