Espire Ads LLC et al v. Tapp Influencers Corp. et al

Filing 141

ORDER granting (140) Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference in case 1:21-cv-10623-JGLC-GWG. The conference is adjourned sine die. The Court is not setting a new date at this time because the joint letter filed by the parties (Docket # 138) in many, i f not most, instances fails to provide responses to the arguments made by the opposition as required by Docket # 136. The Court is hopeful that new counsel will see the infirmities in the letter and will work with Espire to produce a letter that ex plains each side's position or, better yet, eliminates issues. As soon as practicable, the parties are directed to confer by telephone and at length regarding the disputes and to file a new letter by June 6, 2024 that will replace Docket # 13 8. In that new letter, the parties shall propose dates/time for the rescheduled conference. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 5/9/2024) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-10623-JGLC-GWG, 1:21-cv-11068-JGLC-GWG. (mml)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-cv-10623-JGLC-GWG Document 140 Filed 05/08/24 Page 1 of 1 KASOWITZ BENSON TORRES LLP 1633 BROADWAY Stephen P. Thomasch Direct Dial: (212) 542-4733 Direct Fax: (212) 504-2832 SThomasch@kasowitz.com NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019 (212) 506-1700 FAX: (212) 506-1800 ATLANTA HOUSTON LOS ANGELES MIAMI NEWARK SAN FRANCISCO SILICON VALLEY WASHINGTON DC May 8, 2024 VIA ECF Hon. Gabriel W. Gorenstein United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: MEMORANDUM ENDORSED Espire Ads LLC, et al. v. TAPP Influencers Corp., et al., No. 1:21-cv-10623 & TAPP Influencers LLC, et al. v. Espire Ads LLC, et al., No. 1:21-cv-11068 Your Honor: We represent the TAPP Parties in the above-captioned consolidated actions. We write, pursuant to Rule 1.F of Your Honor’s Individual Practices, in response to Your Honor’s May 7th order (ECF No. 139) setting a conference on Friday, May 10th at 3:30 pm to discuss the discovery disputes raised by the parties’ May 2nd joint letter (ECF No. 138). The TAPP Parties request an adjournment of the conference until Friday, June 7th at 3:30 pm because they have selected new counsel to represent them in this consolidated action. The requested extension would allow substitute counsel the opportunity to enter an appearance and get up to speed on the record and issues in this action in advance of the conference. Espire Parties’ counsel, Zachary Meyer, confirmed that he consents to this request, but asks that, if the Court is available on Thursday, June 6th at 3:30 pm, the hearing is rescheduled for that day. The TAPP Parties are available on either day. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Respectfully, /s/ Stephen P. Thomasch Stephen P. Thomasch The conference is adjourned sine die. The Court is not setting a new date at this time because the joint letter filed by the parties (Docket # 138) in many, if not most, instances fails to provide responses to the arguments made by the opposition as required by Docket # 136. The Court is hopeful that new counsel will see the infirmities in the letter and will work with Espire to produce a letter that explains each side’s position or, better yet, eliminates issues. As soon as practicable, the parties are directed to confer by telephone and at length regarding the disputes and to file a new letter by June 6. 2024 that will replace Docket # 138. In that new letter, the parties shall propose dates/time for the rescheduled conference. So Ordered. May 9, 2024

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?