Espire Ads LLC et al v. Tapp Influencers Corp. et al
Filing
141
ORDER granting (140) Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference in case 1:21-cv-10623-JGLC-GWG. The conference is adjourned sine die. The Court is not setting a new date at this time because the joint letter filed by the parties (Docket # 138) in many, i f not most, instances fails to provide responses to the arguments made by the opposition as required by Docket # 136. The Court is hopeful that new counsel will see the infirmities in the letter and will work with Espire to produce a letter that ex plains each side's position or, better yet, eliminates issues. As soon as practicable, the parties are directed to confer by telephone and at length regarding the disputes and to file a new letter by June 6, 2024 that will replace Docket # 13 8. In that new letter, the parties shall propose dates/time for the rescheduled conference. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 5/9/2024) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-10623-JGLC-GWG, 1:21-cv-11068-JGLC-GWG. (mml)
Case 1:21-cv-10623-JGLC-GWG Document 140 Filed 05/08/24 Page 1 of 1
KASOWITZ BENSON TORRES
LLP
1633 BROADWAY
Stephen P. Thomasch
Direct Dial: (212) 542-4733
Direct Fax: (212) 504-2832
SThomasch@kasowitz.com
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019
(212) 506-1700
FAX: (212) 506-1800
ATLANTA
HOUSTON
LOS ANGELES
MIAMI
NEWARK
SAN FRANCISCO
SILICON VALLEY
WASHINGTON DC
May 8, 2024
VIA ECF
Hon. Gabriel W. Gorenstein
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street
New York, NY 10007
Re:
MEMORANDUM ENDORSED
Espire Ads LLC, et al. v. TAPP Influencers Corp., et al., No. 1:21-cv-10623 &
TAPP Influencers LLC, et al. v. Espire Ads LLC, et al., No. 1:21-cv-11068
Your Honor:
We represent the TAPP Parties in the above-captioned consolidated actions. We write,
pursuant to Rule 1.F of Your Honor’s Individual Practices, in response to Your Honor’s May 7th
order (ECF No. 139) setting a conference on Friday, May 10th at 3:30 pm to discuss the discovery
disputes raised by the parties’ May 2nd joint letter (ECF No. 138). The TAPP Parties request an
adjournment of the conference until Friday, June 7th at 3:30 pm because they have selected new
counsel to represent them in this consolidated action. The requested extension would allow
substitute counsel the opportunity to enter an appearance and get up to speed on the record and
issues in this action in advance of the conference. Espire Parties’ counsel, Zachary Meyer,
confirmed that he consents to this request, but asks that, if the Court is available on Thursday,
June 6th at 3:30 pm, the hearing is rescheduled for that day. The TAPP Parties are available on
either day.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.
Respectfully,
/s/ Stephen P. Thomasch
Stephen P. Thomasch
The conference is adjourned sine die. The Court is not setting a new date at this time because the joint
letter filed by the parties (Docket # 138) in many, if not most, instances fails to provide responses to the
arguments made by the opposition as required by Docket # 136. The Court is hopeful that new counsel
will see the infirmities in the letter and will work with Espire to produce a letter that explains each side’s
position or, better yet, eliminates issues. As soon as practicable, the parties are directed to confer by
telephone and at length regarding the disputes and to file a new letter by June 6. 2024 that will replace
Docket # 138. In that new letter, the parties shall propose dates/time for the rescheduled conference.
So Ordered.
May 9, 2024
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?