Wilson v. Lamanna

Filing 23

ORDER denying as moot 20 Motion re: 20 MOTION to make clear the error of receipt of docket #21cv10714 with the same number showing three different justices assigned to this one case. Accordingly, Petitioner's request for a phone conference is DENIED as moot. (And as further set forth herein.)SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 7/29/2022) (jca)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------x
MARCUS WILSON,
Plaintiff,
-againstAMY LAMANNA, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

21-CV-10714 (AT) (OTW)
ORDER

-------------------------------------------------------------x
ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge:
The Court has reviewed pro se Petitioner’s request for a phone conference (ECF 20), and
Defendants’ letter in response. (ECF 22).
Pro se Petitioner seeks an emergency phone conference (ECF 20) because he received a
copy of Defendants’ request for an extension of time to answer Petitioner’s habeas petition
(ECF 18) that improperly included a different case caption. In a letter dated July 21, 2022,
Defendants apologized for including the wrong case caption in their letter and mailed a copy of
the corrected letter to Petitioner. (ECF 22).
Accordingly, Petitioner’s request for a phone conference is DENIED as moot.
SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 29, 2022
New York, New York

s/ Ona T. Wang
Ona T. Wang
United States Magistrate Judge