Wilson v. Lamanna

Filing 23

ORDER denying as moot 20 Motion re: 20 MOTION to make clear the error of receipt of docket #21cv10714 with the same number showing three different justices assigned to this one case. Accordingly, Petitioner's request for a phone conference is DENIED as moot. (And as further set forth herein.)SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 7/29/2022) (jca)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x MARCUS WILSON, Plaintiff, -againstAMY LAMANNA, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : 21-CV-10714 (AT) (OTW) ORDER -------------------------------------------------------------x ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge: The Court has reviewed pro se Petitioner’s request for a phone conference (ECF 20), and Defendants’ letter in response. (ECF 22). Pro se Petitioner seeks an emergency phone conference (ECF 20) because he received a copy of Defendants’ request for an extension of time to answer Petitioner’s habeas petition (ECF 18) that improperly included a different case caption. In a letter dated July 21, 2022, Defendants apologized for including the wrong case caption in their letter and mailed a copy of the corrected letter to Petitioner. (ECF 22). Accordingly, Petitioner’s request for a phone conference is DENIED as moot. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 29, 2022 New York, New York s/ Ona T. Wang Ona T. Wang United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?