In Re Application of Makhpal Karibzhanova for Judicial Assistance Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1782

Filing 19

ORDER denying 14 MOTION to Seal Exhibits D and E to the Declaration of Aidan Karibzhanov and direct counsel to redact nonpublic information. Accordingly, Ms. Karibzhanova's motion is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 14. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 8/17/2021) (jca)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-mc-00442-KPF Document 19 Filed 08/17/21 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re APPLICATION OF MAKHPAL KARIBZHANOVA FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1782, 21 Misc. 442 (KPF) ORDER MAKHPAL KARIBZHANOVA, Applicant. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: On August 11, 2021, Applicant Makhpal Karibzhanova filed a motion to seal certain exhibits and redact certain nonpublic information in proposed intervenor Aidan Karibzhanov’s filings in support of his motion to intervene. (Dkt. #14-16). Mr. Karibzhanov filed a response in opposition on August 13, 2021. (Dkt. #18). The Court is disappointed that both Ms. Karibzhanova’s initial filings in this matter and Mr. Karibzhanov’s motion to intervene contain unnecessary attacks on each other and sensitive information concerning their daughter. The Court does not condone this behavior and advises the parties to refrain from including such extraneous and inflammatory information in future submissions. However, in this instance it was Ms. Karibzhanova’s own allegations against Mr. Karibzhanov that opened the door to the Court receiving information regarding the character and conduct of both Mr. Karibzhanov and Ms. Karibzhanova. Furthermore, the Court agrees with Mr. Karibzhanov that he is not legally barred from introducing the relevant state court filings in this Case 1:21-mc-00442-KPF Document 19 Filed 08/17/21 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?