In Re Application of Makhpal Karibzhanova for Judicial Assistance Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1782
Filing
19
ORDER denying 14 MOTION to Seal Exhibits D and E to the Declaration of Aidan Karibzhanov and direct counsel to redact nonpublic information. Accordingly, Ms. Karibzhanova's motion is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 14. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 8/17/2021) (jca)
Case 1:21-mc-00442-KPF Document 19 Filed 08/17/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
In re
APPLICATION OF MAKHPAL
KARIBZHANOVA FOR JUDICIAL
ASSISTANCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
SECTION 1782,
21 Misc. 442 (KPF)
ORDER
MAKHPAL KARIBZHANOVA,
Applicant.
KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge:
On August 11, 2021, Applicant Makhpal Karibzhanova filed a motion to
seal certain exhibits and redact certain nonpublic information in proposed
intervenor Aidan Karibzhanov’s filings in support of his motion to intervene.
(Dkt. #14-16). Mr. Karibzhanov filed a response in opposition on August 13,
2021. (Dkt. #18).
The Court is disappointed that both Ms. Karibzhanova’s initial filings in
this matter and Mr. Karibzhanov’s motion to intervene contain unnecessary
attacks on each other and sensitive information concerning their daughter.
The Court does not condone this behavior and advises the parties to refrain
from including such extraneous and inflammatory information in future
submissions. However, in this instance it was Ms. Karibzhanova’s own
allegations against Mr. Karibzhanov that opened the door to the Court receiving
information regarding the character and conduct of both Mr. Karibzhanov and
Ms. Karibzhanova. Furthermore, the Court agrees with Mr. Karibzhanov that
he is not legally barred from introducing the relevant state court filings in this
Case 1:21-mc-00442-KPF Document 19 Filed 08/17/21 Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?