Application of Alberto Safra for an Order to take Discovery for use in foreign proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that (i) Respondents and Ms. Safra shall respond to the Application on or before February 9, 2022; and (ii) Petitioner will file his reply, if any, on or before February 23, 2022. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this stipulation may be executed in counterparts and that a facsimile or electronic signature shall have the same binding effect on all parties hereto as an original signature. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 2/9/2022, Replies due by 2/23/2022.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 1/7/2022) (jca)
Case 1:21-mc-00640-GHW-JLC Document 40 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
IN RE APPLICATION OF ALBERTO SAFRA
FOR AN ORDER TO TAKE DISCOVERY FOR
USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT
TO 28 U.S.C. § 1782
1/7/2022
No. 21-MC-00640-GHW
STIPULATION AND
ORDER
WHEREAS, on August 5, 2021, petitioner Alberto Safra (the "Petitioner") filed
an application for an order to take discovery for use in foreign proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1782 (the "Application");
WHEREAS, the Application seeks permission to serve subpoenas duces tecum and
ad testificandum on Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Dr. Eli L. Diamond and Dr. Viviane
Tabar (collectively, the "MSKCC Respondents") as well as Mount Sinai Health System, Dr. Susan
Bressman and Dr. Valentine Fuster (collectively, the "Mount Sinai Respondents" and together
with the MSKCC Respondents, the "Respondents");
WHEREAS, by order dated August 6, 2021, the Court (i) directed Petitioner to
serve the Application on Respondents on or before August 13, 2021, (ii) directed that any
opposition to the Application must be served no later than August 27, 2021, (iii) directed Petitioner
to file his reply, if any, on or before September 3, 2021, and (iv) set a hearing on the Application
on September 13, 2021 at 4 p.m. (ECF No. 8);
WHEREAS, on August 24, 2021, Petitioner and Respondents jointly requested
that the Court extend these deadlines (ECF No. 11);
WHEREAS, on August 24, 2021, the Court granted this request, ordering that
(i) Respondents respond to the Application on or before September 24, 2021, (ii) Petitioner file
his reply, if any, on or before October 8, 2021, and (iii) the hearing be adjourned to October 19,
Case 1:21-mc-00640-GHW-JLC Document 40 Filed 01/07/22 Page 2 of 4
2021 (ECF No. 12);
WHEREAS, on August 31, 2021, Ms. Safra, as the executor and administrator of
the Estate of Joseph Yacoub Safra, moved to intervene in this action (ECF No. 18);
WHEREAS, on September 3, 2021, P etitioner consented to Ms. Safra's
intervention in this action (ECF No. 22);
WHEREAS, the Court granted Ms. Safra's motion to intervene on September 6,
2021 (ECF No. 23);
WHEREAS, on September 24, 2021, Ms. Safra requested the Court extend the
deadlines entered by the Court on August 24, 2021 (ECF No. 29);
WHEREAS, on September 24, 2021, the Court granted this request, ordering that
(i) Respondents and Ms. Safra respond to the Application on or before October 25, 2021;
(ii) Petitioner file his reply, if any, on or before November 8, 2021; and (iii) the hearing be
adjourned to December 21, 2021 (ECF No. 30);
WHEREAS, on October 21, 2021, Ms. Safra and Petitioner requested the Court
extend the deadlines entered by the Court on September 24, 2021 (ECF No. 32);
WHEREAS, on October 21, 2021, the Court granted this request, ordering that
(i) Respondents and Ms. Safra respond to the Application on or before November 24, 2021;
(ii) Petitioner file his reply, if any, on or before December 8, 2021; and (iii) the hearing on the
Application remain scheduled for December 21, 2021 (ECF No. 33);
WHEREAS, on November 22, 2021, Ms. Safra and Petitioner requested the Court
extend the deadlines entered by the Court on October 21, 2021 (ECF No. 35);
WHEREAS, on November 22, 2021, the Court granted this request, ordering that
(i) Respondents and Ms. Safra respond to the Application on or before January 10, 2022;
-2-
Case 1:21-mc-00640-GHW-JLC Document 40 Filed 01/07/22 Page 3 of 4
(ii) Petitioner file his reply, if any, on or before January 24, 2022; and (iii) the hearing be adjourned
to a date to be set by the Court (ECF No. 36). The Court has not yet set a new hearing date.
WHEREAS, the parties to this stipulation wish, subject to the Court's approval, to
extend the briefing schedule on the Application as set forth below.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that (i) Respondents
and Ms. Safra shall respond to the Application on or before February 9, 2022; and (ii) Petitioner
will file his reply, if any, on or before February 23, 2022.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this stipulation may be
executed in counterparts and that a facsimile or electronic signature shall have the same binding
effect on all parties hereto as an original signature.
Dated: January 7, 2022
SULLIVAN& CROMWELL LLP
BARNES& THORNBURG LLP
Isl Steven L. Holley
Steven L. Holley
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004-2498
Tel: (212) 558-4000
Isl Joseph A. Matteo
Joseph A. Matteo
445 Park Avenue, Suite 700
New York, New York 10022
Tel: (646) 746-2000
Attorney for Vicky Safra
Attorney for Respondents Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, Dr. Eli L. Diamond
and Dr. Viviane Tabar
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART&
SULLIVAN, LLP
THE OFFICE OF THE GENERAL
COUNSEL
MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM
Isl Michael Carlinsky
Michael Carlinsky
51 Madison Avenue, Floor 22
New York, New York 10010
Isl Erica D. Liu
Erica D. Liu
150 E. 42nd Street, Suite B-2.17
New York, New York 10017
-3-
Case 1:21-mc-00640-GHW-JLC Document 40 Filed 01/07/22 Page 4 of 4
Tel: (212) 849-7000
Tel: (212) 659-8105
Attorney for Petitioner Alberto Safra
Attorney for Respondents Mount Sinai Health
System, Dr. Susan Bressman and Dr.
Valentine Fuster
SO ORDERED:
1/7/2022
Hon. James L. Cott, U.S.M.J.
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?