Erkan v. Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

Filing 27

ORDER granting 26 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Accordingly, the deadline for the plaintiff to apply for restoration of the case to the Court's active calendar, or, alternatively, for the parties to submit a stipulation of settlement and dismissal, is extended to August 5, 2022. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Dkt. No. 26. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 8/1/2022) (rro)

Download PDF
Case 1:22-cv-00186-GHW Document 27 Filed 08/01/22 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------- X : MARCUS MEHMET ERKAN, : : Plaintiff, : : -against: : GENCO SHIPPING & TRADING LIMITED, : : Defendant. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: 8/1/2022 1:22-cv-186-GHW ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: On June 14, 2022, the Court issued an order conditionally discontinuing this action. Pursuant to the terms of that order, the plaintiff was provided the option to apply for restoration of the action to the active calendar of the Court by the date that was 30 days following the issuance of the order. In accordance with the terms of that order, if the plaintiff failed to apply for restoration of the case by that date, the case would be automatically dismissed with prejudice. The Court extended that deadline on July 15, 2022. By letter dated July 29, 2022, the plaintiff has requested that the Court extend the deadline for the plaintiff to apply for restoration of the case to the Court’s active calendar, or, alternatively, for the parties to submit a stipulation of settlement and dismissal. 1 That application is GRANTED. Accordingly, the deadline for the plaintiff to apply for restoration of the case to the Court’s active calendar, or, alternatively, for the parties to submit a stipulation of settlement and As explained in Rule 4(E) of the Court’s Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce confidential settlement agreements. If the parties wish that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement, the parties must place the terms of their settlement agreement on the public record. 1 Case 1:22-cv-00186-GHW Document 27 Filed 08/01/22 Page 2 of 2 dismissal, is extended to August 5, 2022. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Dkt. No. 26. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 1, 2022 New York, New York __________________________________ GREGORY H. WOODS United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?