Upsolve, Inc. et al v. James
Filing 69
ORDER: denying 63 Motion to Intervene; denying 64 Motion to Intervene. For the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion granting Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, Rosenberg seeks much broader relief than Plaintiffs, and is not similarly situated. See ECF No. 68 at 17 n.6. His intervention would deeply complicate the issues presented and delay the proceedings. Therefore, his motion to intervene is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at ECF Numbers 63 and 64. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 5/25/2022) (ama)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
