Standmill S.R.O. v. Fargesen et al

Filing 21

ORDER granting 20 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 8/2/2022) (rro)

Case
20 Filed 08/02/22 Page 1 of 2
44
Case 1:22-cv-01537-LLS Document 21

.

ORIGINAL

GUSRAE KAPLAN NUSBAUM PLLC
ATTORN E YS AT LAW
120 WALL STR EE T - zs rn FLOOR

O F C O UNSEL

N E W YORK , N E W YORK 10005

ROB E RT L. BLE SSEY

SCOTT H . GOLDST E IN

~

MARTIN H . KAPLAN

t;!,...,1..,,,9

LAWRE NC E G . N U SBAU M

I(,._.,;,

TEL [phone]
FA X [phone]

w;,•

t.:.?:.:

w ww . gu s r a ek a plan . c om

ti ::~

r~

August 2, 2022
VIA ECF
The Honorable Louis L. Stanton
United States District Judge
Southern District of New York
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse
500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 21C
New York, New York 10007

t·, nc ,n'\f\'

I nnc!·\ , F\T
1

t LL, 1 RO \IC , t. LY FILr n :
0
~

[

;1LrD:

llf t.-'1_.:i...

RE: Standmill S.R.O. v. Fargesen et al., l:22-cv-01537-LLS
Dear Judge Stanton:
This firm represents Defendant Igor Palatnik in the above-captioned action and
writes jointly with counsel for Plaintiff "Standmill" S.R.O. to respectfully move the
Court to adjourn the conference scheduled for Friday, August 5, 2022 at noon. This is
the first request to adjourn this conference's deadline. See generally Dkt.
The parties jointly request adjournment sine non die because today, Mr. Palatpik
and the plaintiff in a separate, first-filed case, Mouazeb v. Fargensen et al., 1:21{:v09226-JPO, moved to consolidate that case with this one. See Exhibit A, Mouazeb
Motion to Consolidate.
The same law firm represents the plaintiff in both this action and in Mouazeb,
and undersigned counsel represents Mr. Palatnik in both civil cases and the original,
criminal action from which they stem. Because the only factual differences between the
two civil cases are the plaintiffs' identities and their respective securities purchases,
both plaintiffs and Mr. Palatnik believe that consolidation is appropriate, and are
optimistic that Judge Oetken will grant the Rule 42 motion.

Sb
0~

k~.l

G

.s r~
1 l'° l7-

Case
Case 1:22-cv-01537-LLS
1:22-cv-01537-LLS Document
Document 20
21 Filed
Filed 08/02/22
08/02/22 Page
Page 22 of
of 44
2
GusRAE KAPLAN NUSBAUM

PLLC

.,.

The Honorable Louis L. Stanton
August 2, 2022
Page 2
The parties thank the Court for considering this motion to adjourn Friday's
conference.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Kari Parks
Kari Parks
CC: All Counsel of Record (via ECF)