Arai v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 30

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC.: The Court is in receipt of a letter from Plaintiff stating that Plaintiff and Defendant Experian Information Solutions Inc. have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 29]. Accordin gly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for a stay is DENIED. It is further ordered that the above-captioned case is discontinued as to Defendant Experian Information Solutions Inc. without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the case to this Court's calendar if the application to restore is made by November 31, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action as to Defendant Experian Information Solutions Inc. is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). All other dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die. In any request to restore the case to the Court's calendar, the parties must specify that they have not signed a settlement agreement. SO ORDERED. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. terminated. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 9/16/2022) (tg)

Case 1:22-cv-01577-MKV Document 30 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 1
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 9/16/2022

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
NATALIA ARAI,
Plaintiff,

1:22-cv-01577 (MKV)

-againstEXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION
SERVICES, LLC, and FORD MOTOR
CREDIT COMPANY LLC,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL
AS TO EXPERIAN INORMATION
SOLUTIONS INC.

Defendants.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:
The Court is in receipt of a letter from Plaintiff stating that Plaintiff and Defendant Experian
Information Solutions Inc. have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 29]. Accordingly, IT
IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for a stay is DENIED. It is further ordered that the
above-captioned case is discontinued as to Defendant Experian Information Solutions Inc. without
costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the case to this Court’s calendar if the
application to restore is made by November 31, 2022. If no such application is made by that date,
today’s dismissal of the action as to Defendant Experian Information Solutions Inc. is with
prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). All
other dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die.
In any request to restore the case to the Court’s calendar, the parties must specify that they
have not signed a settlement agreement.
SO ORDERED.
Date: September 16, 2022
New York, NY

_________________________________
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
United States District Judge