Reed v. Krause et al
Filing
22
ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Court has been advised that this action has been settled. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. Any pending dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die, and any pending motions are moot. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 1/18/2023) (jca)
Case 1:22-cv-01999-OTW Document 22 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 1
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------------x
MICHAEL REED,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-against:
:
CHARLTON KRAUSE, et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
:
--------------------------------------------------------------x
22-CV-1999 (OTW)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge:
The Court has been advised that this action has been settled. Accordingly, it is ORDERED
that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and
without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if
the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed
within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely
on that basis.
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. Any pending dates and
deadlines are adjourned sine die, and any pending motions are moot.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 18, 2023
New York, New York
s/ Ona T. Wang
Ona T. Wang
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?