Calixto et al v. Prime Square Restaurant Corp. et al

Filing 25

ORDER: It has been reported to the Court that mediation was unsuccessful. By separate order, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Moses for general pretrial. It is hereby: ORDERED that, to conserve resources, to promote judicial efficien cy, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before Judge Moses. If the parties consent to proceed before Judge Moses, they must, within two weeks of the date of this Order, submit to the Court a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, a copy of which is attached to this Order (and also available at http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/consent-to-proceed-before-us-magistrate judge). If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before Judge Moses rather than before this Court. Any appeal would be tak en directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be from this Court if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the Magistrate Jud ge, the parties must file a joint letter, within two weeks of the date of this Order, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. No adverse consequences will res ult from the withholding of that consent. The parties are reminded that, in most cases, settlements of claims under the FLSA must be approved by the Court. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/1/2022) (kv)

Download PDF
Case 1:22-cv-02610-RA Document 25 Filed 08/01/22 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EDUARDO CALIXTO and JORGE RODRIGUEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. 22-CV-2610 (RA) ORDER PRIME SQUARE RESTAURANT CORP., FERIT (FRANK) KODZA, and BEKIM (BENNY) KOXHA, Defendants. RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that mediation was unsuccessful. By separate order, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Moses for general pretrial. It is hereby: ORDERED that, to conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before Judge Moses. If the parties consent to proceed before Judge Moses, they must, within two weeks of the date of this Order, submit to the Court a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, a copy of which is attached to this Order (and also available at http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/consent-to-proceed-before-us-magistrate-judge). If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before Judge Moses rather than before this Court. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be from this Court if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. Case 1:22-cv-02610-RA Document 25 Filed 08/01/22 Page 2 of 3 If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, within two weeks of the date of this Order, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. No adverse consequences will result from the withholding of that consent. The parties are reminded that, in most cases, settlements of claims under the FLSA must be approved by the Court. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). SO ORDERED. Dated: August 1, 2022 New York, New York Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge 2 Case 1:22-cv-02610-RA Document 25 Filed 08/01/22 Page 3 of 3 AO 85 (Rev. 02/17) Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the __________ District of __________ Plaintiff v. Defendant ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. NOTICE, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Notice of a magistrate judge’s availability. A United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including a jury or nonjury trial) and to order the entry of a final judgment. The judgment may then be appealed directly to the United States court of appeals like any other judgment of this court. A magistrate judge may exercise this authority only if all parties voluntarily consent. You may consent to have your case referred to a magistrate judge, or you may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. The name of any party withholding consent will not be revealed to any judge who may otherwise be involved with your case. Consent to a magistrate judge’s authority. The following parties consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in this case including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings. Printed names of parties and attorneys Signatures of parties or attorneys Dates Reference Order IT IS ORDERED: This case is referred to a United States magistrate judge to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Date: District Judge’s signature Printed name and title Note: Return this form to the clerk of court only if you are consenting to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States magistrate judge. Do not return this form to a judge. Print Save As... Reset

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?