United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stone et al

Filing 168

JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT DAVID LEE STONE The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant David Lee Stone ("Defendant") having entered a general appearance; consented to the Courts jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Judgment: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restr ained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using an y means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of e nforcing the terms of this Judgment. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment forthwith and without further notice. (And as further set forth herein.) David Lee Stone terminated. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 11/17/2022) (jca)

Download PDF
Case 1:22-cv-03553-VM Document 168 Filed 11/17/22 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 11/17/2022 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 22 Civ. 3553 ( VM ) Plaintiff, v. DAVID LEE STONE and JOHN D. ROBSON, Defendants, and HAROLD J. STONE, GWENDOLYN STONE, JUSTIN BLAKESLEY, and BRETT R. ADAMS, Relief Defendants. JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT DAVID LEE STONE The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant David Lee Stone (“Defendant”) having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Judgment: I. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated 1 Case 1:22-cv-03553-VM Document 168 Filed 11/17/22 Page 2 of 4 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, prejudgment interest thereon, and a civil penalty pursuant to Sections 21A and/or 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 78u-1, 78u(d)(3)]. The Court shall determine the amounts of the disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalty upon motion of the Commission. In connection with the Commission’s motion for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and/or civil penalties, and at any hearing held on such a motion: (a) Defendant will be precluded from arguing that he did not violate the federal securities laws as alleged in the Complaint; (b) Defendant may not challenge the validity of the Consent or this 2 Case 1:22-cv-03553-VM Document 168 Filed 11/17/22 Page 3 of 4 Judgment; (c) solely for the purposes of such motion, the allegations of the Complaint shall be accepted as and deemed true by the Court; and (d) the Court may determine the issues raised in the motion on the basis of affidavits, declarations, excerpts of sworn deposition or investigative testimony, and documentary evidence, without regard to the standards for summary judgment contained in Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In connection with the Commission’s motion, the parties may take discovery, including discovery from appropriate non-parties. III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent of Defendant David Lee Stone is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). 3 Case 1:22-cv-03553-VM Document 168 Filed 11/17/22 Page 4 of 4 V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Judgment. VI. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment forthwith and without further notice. Dated: November 17, 2022 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?