Picon v. Maurice Badler Fine Jewelry, Ltd.

Filing 11

ORDER: The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The parties may reopen the case, provided the application t o restore the action to the Courts calendar is made within forty-five (45) days of this Order. Any application to reopen filed after forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. Any pending motions are DISMISSED as moot, and all conferences and deadlines are CANCELLED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 9/15/2022) (va)

Download PDF
Case 1:22-cv-03777-LJL Document 11 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : YELITZA PICON, on behalf of herself and all other : persons similarly situated, : : Plaintiffs, : : -v: : MAURICE BADLER FINE JEWELRY, LTD., : : Defendant. : X ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 09/15/2022 22-cv-03777 (LJL) ORDER LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The parties may reopen the case, provided the application to restore the action to the Court’s calendar is made within forty-five (45) days of this Order. Any application to reopen filed after forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. Any pending motions are DISMISSED as moot, and all conferences and deadlines are CANCELLED. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 15, 2022 New York, New York __________________________________ LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?