Chalas v. Back Market Inc
Filing
10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 9]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued w ithout costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by September 1, 20 22. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 9/1/2022.) (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 8/1/2022) (kv)
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 8/1/2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ANA CHALAS Individually, and On Behalf of All
Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiff,
1:22-cv-04199-MKV
-against-
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
BACK MARKET INC.,
Defendant.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:
The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have
reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 9]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to
restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement
in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by September 1, 2022. If no
such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze,
Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).
SO ORDERED.
Date: August 1, 2022
New York, NY
_________________________________
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?