Chalas v. Back Market Inc

Filing 10

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 9]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued w ithout costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by September 1, 20 22. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 9/1/2022.) (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 8/1/2022) (kv)

Download PDF
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 8/1/2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANA CHALAS Individually, and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, 1:22-cv-04199-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL BACK MARKET INC., Defendant. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 9]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by September 1, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED. Date: August 1, 2022 New York, NY _________________________________ MARY KAY VYSKOCIL United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?