Forrest v. New York City Housing Authority et al

Filing 36

MEMO ENDORSEMENT denying as moot 22 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Retaliation Claims in the First Amended Complaint. ENDORSEMENT Request GRANTED in part. The Court will permit the parties to submit briefing on the motion to dismiss regardi ng the Second Amended Complaint. In order to consolidate briefing papers and ensure all arguments and citations accurately reflect the operative pleading, however, the parties shall refile their motion papers rather than filing supplemental letter- briefs. Accordingly, the Court will DENY the motion to dismiss as moot. Defendants shall file their motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint by January 20, 2023. Plaintiff shall file their opposition by January 27, 2023. Defendants shall file any reply by February 3, 2023. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate ECF No. 22. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 1/17/2023) (jca)

Download PDF
Case 1:22-cv-06480-JLR Document 36 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 2 January 13, 2023 Via ECF Hon. Jennifer L. Rochon United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Forrest v New York City Housing Authority, et al.; Case No. 1:22-cv-06480 (JLR) Dear Judge Rochon: We represent Plaintiff Tracy L. Forrest in the above-referenced action. We write on behalf of all parties to the litigation to inform the Court that Defendants have consented to Plaintiff’s filing a Second Amended Complaint, which we will do today, attaching a redline showing the changes to the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 18) as an exhibit per the Court’s Rules. In accordance with Your Honor’s suggestion at the December 15, 2022, preliminary conference, rather than Defendants filing a new motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s retaliation claims (“Motion to Dismiss”) as a result of the filing of the Second Amended Complaint, the parties respectfully propose the following: 1. Defendants may by no later than January 20, 2023, file a letter-brief of no more than five pages regarding the impact, if any, of the new allegations in the Second Amended Complaint on their Motion to Dismiss, which is presently fully briefed and before Your Honor (see ECF Nos. 22-24, 27-28); 2. Plaintiff may file an opposition letter-brief of no more than five pages by or before January 27, 2023; and 3. Defendants may file a reply letter-brief, if any, of no more than five pages by or before February 3, 2023. The parties respectfully request that the Court so order the letter-briefing schedule described above. The parties further stipulate that, in light of the proposed arrangement above, Defendants’ presently pending Motion to Dismiss shall constitute a responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint, and Defendants may file their answer to the Second Amended Complaint within 14 days of the Courts’ decision on the Motion to Dismiss, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4). Case 1:22-cv-06480-JLR Document 36 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2 January 13, 2023 Page 2 Please do not hesitate to contact the parties in the event the Court wishes to discuss this matter further. Respectfully submitted, Edward Hernstadt cc: All counsel of record (via ECF) Request GRANTED in part. The Court will permit the parties to submit briefing on the motion to dismiss regarding the Second Amended Complaint. In order to consolidate briefing papers and ensure all arguments and citations accurately reflect the operative pleading, however, the parties shall refile their motion papers rather than filing supplemental letter-briefs. Accordingly, the Court will DENY the motion to dismiss as moot. Defendants shall file their motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint by January 20, 2023. Plaintiff shall file their opposition by January 27, 2023. Defendants shall file any reply by February 3, 2023. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate ECF No. 22. Dated: January 17, 2023 New York, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?