Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Filing
11
ORDER with respect to #9 Motion to Quash. This case was referred for General Pretrial on September 16, 2022. Dkt. No. 10. As such, the Motion to Quash filed on September 13, 2022, Dkt. No. 9, is now before this Court. The following briefing schedule is set regarding the pending motion: Plaintiff's opposition is due by September 30, 2022. Defendant's reply, should they choose to file one, is due by October 7, 2022. Plaintiff is directed to notify the Internet Service Provider upon which the subpoena at issue was served to not provide the information sought by the subpoena pending the resolution of this motion. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E Willis on 9/16/2022) (tg)
Case 1:22-cv-06619-JPC-JW Document 11 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
-against-
22-CV-6619 (JPC) (JW)
JOHN DOE,
Defendant.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
JENNIFER E. WILLIS, United States Magistrate Judge:
This case was referred for General Pretrial on September 16, 2022. Dkt. No.
10. As such, the Motion to Quash filed on September 13, 2022, Dkt. No. 9, is now
before this Court. The following briefing schedule is set regarding the pending
motion:
Plaintiff’s opposition is due by September 30, 2022.
Defendant’s reply, should they choose to file one, is due by October 7, 2022.
Plaintiff is directed to notify the Internet Service Provider upon which the subpoena
at issue was served to not provide the information sought by the subpoena pending
the resolution of this motion.
SO ORDERED.
DATED:
New York, New York
September 16, 2022
______________________________
JENNIFER E. WILLIS
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?