Farrow v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al

Filing 6

ORDER: The Court directs the Clerk of Court to terminate Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF 3) and all other pending matters in this action without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. terminating #3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 9/14/22) (rdz)

Case 1:22-cv-07248-LTS Document 6 Filed 09/14/22 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JUSTIN FARROW,
Plaintiff,
-against-

22-CV-7248 (LTS)

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY
SUPERVISION, et al.,

ORDER

Defendants.
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:
On September 2, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting preliminary injunctive relief
and a supporting declaration in Farrow v. Cordez, No. 22-CV-5952 (LTS). That same day, the
Court issued an order directing the Clerk of Court refile the motion in this action, which was
being transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, for
consideration by the transferee court. See ECF 1:22-CV-5952, 19. As this action and Plaintiff’s
motion have now been transferred to the Northern District of New York, the Court directs the
Clerk of Court to terminate the motion and all other pending matters in this case without
prejudice.
CONCLUSION
The Court directs the Clerk of Court to terminate Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary
injunction (ECF 3) and all other pending matters in this action without prejudice.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would
not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an

Case 1:22-cv-07248-LTS Document 6 Filed 09/14/22 Page 2 of 2

appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant
demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 14, 2022
New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN
Chief United States District Judge

2