Kaplan Group Investments, LLC et al v. A.S.A.P. Logistics LTD et al

Filing 6

ORDER: Plaintiffs are directed to respond within 14 days, addressing whether paragraph 125 should be stricken. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/16/2022) (ate)

Download PDF
Case 1:22-cv-07326-JPO Document 6 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KAPLAN GROUP INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, -v- 22-CV-7326 (JPO) ORDER A.S.A.P. LOGISTICS Ltd., et al., Defendants. J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: The Court has received the attached correspondence from the Turkish Ambassador to the United States, which requests that paragraph 125 of the complaint be stricken. Under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[t]he court may strike from a pleading . . . any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.” To prevail on a motion to strike, a movant “must demonstrate that (1) no evidence in support of the allegations would be admissible; (2) that the allegations have no bearing on the issues in the case; and (3) that to permit the allegations to stand would result in prejudice to the movant.” Acco, Ltd. v. Rich Kids Jeans Corp., No. 15 Civ. 7425 (JSR), 2016 WL 3144053, *1 (April 11, 2016) (citation omitted). Plaintiffs are directed to respond within 14 days, addressing whether paragraph 125 should be stricken. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 16, 2022 New York, New York ____________________________________ Case 1:22-cv-07326-JPO Document 6 Filed 09/16/22 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?