Cawthon v. Cong Ty Co Phan Tap Doan Apec Viet Nam

Filing 42

CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 40 Report and Recommendations, 41 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations in favor of Scott Cawthon against Cong Ty Co Phan Tap Doan Apec Viet Nam in the amount of $ 18,372.62. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED A ND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 6, 2025, the Report and Recommendation in ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff be awarded the following: Damages, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c): $10,000.00; Attorn eys' fees, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505: $7,970.62; Costs: $402.00; and Post-judgment Interest, from the date of entry of the award, until the date of payment, using the federal rate as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 3/6/2025) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (tp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------X SCOTT CAWTHON, 22 CIVIL 7396 (VSB)(OTW) Plaintiff, JUDGMENT -againstCONG TY CO PHAN TAP DOAN APEC VIET NAM, Defendant. -------------------------------------------------------------------------X It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 6, 2025, the Report and Recommendation in ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff be awarded the following: Damages, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c): $10,000.00; Attorneys' fees, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505: $7,970.62; Costs: $402.00; and Postjudgment Interest, from the date of entry of the award, until the date of payment, using the federal rate as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York March 6, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerk of Court BY: _________________________ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?