Jimenez v. Dept. of Justice

Filing 2

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court dismisses this action without prejudice to any civil action that Jose Sanchez Jimenez may wish to bring in the future. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 9/13/22) (rdz)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JOSE SANCHEZ JIMENEZ,
Petitioner,
-againstDEPT OF JUSTICE,

22-CV-7685 (LTS)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Respondent.
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:
On September 7, 2022 the Court received this pro se action, purportedly filed by Jose
Sanchez Jimenez. It appears, however, that this action was actually filed by Young Yil Jo (“Jo”).
On January 18, 2015, the court barred Jo from filing any document in this court in the name of
another person, In re Young Yil Jo, ECF 1:14-CV-7793, 2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2015), and on May 6,
2015, the court barred Jo from filing any new civil action or proceeding in this court without first
obtaining leave of the court, In re Young Yil Jo, ECF 1:14-CV-7793, 3 (S.D.N.Y. May 6, 2015).
Because the Court finds that this action was filed by Jo, the Court dismisses this action
without prejudice to any civil action that Jose Sanchez Jimenez may wish to bring in the future.
The Court advises Jo that the filing injunctions issued in In re Young Yil Jo, 1:14-CV7793 (S.D.N.Y.), remain in effect. Jo is enjoined from filing any new civil action or proceeding
in this court without first obtaining leave of the court. Jo also remains barred from filing any
document in this court in the name of another person.
The Court will continue to dismiss any civil action or proceeding filed by Jo in the name
of another person without prejudice to any civil action that that person may wish to bring in the
future. Should Jo persist in filing civil actions in this court in the name of other persons, the
Court may impose additional restrictions and sanctions on him. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651.

CONCLUSION
The Court dismisses this action without prejudice to any civil action that Jose Sanchez
Jimenez may wish to bring in the future.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would
not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an
appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 13, 2022
New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN
Chief United States District Judge

2