Jimenez v. Dept. of Justice

Filing 2

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court dismisses this action without prejudice to any civil action that Jose Sanchez Jimenez may wish to bring in the future. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 9/13/22) (rdz)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSE SANCHEZ JIMENEZ, Petitioner, -againstDEPT OF JUSTICE, 22-CV-7685 (LTS) ORDER OF DISMISSAL Respondent. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On September 7, 2022 the Court received this pro se action, purportedly filed by Jose Sanchez Jimenez. It appears, however, that this action was actually filed by Young Yil Jo (“Jo”). On January 18, 2015, the court barred Jo from filing any document in this court in the name of another person, In re Young Yil Jo, ECF 1:14-CV-7793, 2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2015), and on May 6, 2015, the court barred Jo from filing any new civil action or proceeding in this court without first obtaining leave of the court, In re Young Yil Jo, ECF 1:14-CV-7793, 3 (S.D.N.Y. May 6, 2015). Because the Court finds that this action was filed by Jo, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice to any civil action that Jose Sanchez Jimenez may wish to bring in the future. The Court advises Jo that the filing injunctions issued in In re Young Yil Jo, 1:14-CV7793 (S.D.N.Y.), remain in effect. Jo is enjoined from filing any new civil action or proceeding in this court without first obtaining leave of the court. Jo also remains barred from filing any document in this court in the name of another person. The Court will continue to dismiss any civil action or proceeding filed by Jo in the name of another person without prejudice to any civil action that that person may wish to bring in the future. Should Jo persist in filing civil actions in this court in the name of other persons, the Court may impose additional restrictions and sanctions on him. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651. CONCLUSION The Court dismisses this action without prejudice to any civil action that Jose Sanchez Jimenez may wish to bring in the future. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 13, 2022 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?