Yang v. United States of America

Filing 11

ORDER: Pai Yang has moved to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 § U.S.C. 2255 on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. (Pet'r's Mot., ECF No. 84.) In connection with Mr. Yang's claim that four bank accounts (the "Seized Accounts") were improperly subject to forfeiture, the Government stated that it would provide the Court with an affidavit that set forth "ample connection between the [Seized] [A]ccounts and Yang's money lau ndering activity[.]" (Gov't Opp'n at 11, ECF No. 86.) The Court has not received the affidavit. The Government is ORDERED to provide a copy of the affidavit to the Court by December 15, 2023. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 11/15/2023) (ama)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------X Pai Yang, Petitioner-Defendant. November 15, 2023 18-CR-033 (KMW) 22-CV-8024 (KMW) v. ORDER United States of America, Respondent. ------------------------------------------------------------X KIMBA M. WOOD, United States District Judge: Pai Yang has moved to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 § U.S.C. 2255 on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. (Pet’r’s Mot., ECF No. 84.) In connection with Mr. Yang’s claim that four bank accounts (the “Seized Accounts”) were improperly subject to forfeiture, the Government stated that it would provide the Court with an affidavit that set forth “ample connection between the [Seized] [A]ccounts and Yang’s money laundering activity[.]” (Gov’t Opp’n at 11, ECF No. 86.) The Court has not received the affidavit. The Government is ORDERED to provide a copy of the affidavit to the Court by December 15, 2023. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York November 15, 2023 /s/ Kimba M. Wood KIMBA M. WOOD United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?