Hibbert v. The State of New York et al

Filing 32

ORDER: The Court has received a letter written by Mr. Hibbert on May 9, 2023, and posted to the docket on May 15, 2023. Dkt. No. 31. Mr. Hibbert informs the Court that he never received a HIPPA release form from Corporation Counsel that he was to si gn and send back to her. And he also informs the Court (and Corporation Counsel) that he is prepared to engage in settlement discussions. Corporation Counsel is directed to file a letter on the docket, by no later than May 25, 2023, with a status upd ate concerning the two items raised in Mr. Hibbert's letter. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 5/18/2023) (rro)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
----------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
CONROY HIBBERT, JR.,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-v :
:
CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
:
:
Defendants. :
:
----------------------------------------------------------------- X
GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:

USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #: _________________
DATE FILED: 5/18/2023

1:22-cv-8257-GHW
ORDER

The Court has received a letter written by Mr. Hibbert on May 9, 2023, and posted to the
docket on May 15, 2023. Dkt. No. 31. Mr. Hibbert informs the Court that he never received a
HIPPA release form from Corporation Counsel that he was to sign and send back to her. And he
also informs the Court (and Corporation Counsel) that he is prepared to engage in settlement
discussions.
Corporation Counsel is directed to file a letter on the docket, by no later than May 25, 2023,
with a status update concerning the two items raised in Mr. Hibbert’s letter.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. The Court certifies,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith,
and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S.
438, 444–45 (1962).
SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 18, 2023
New York, New York

__________________________________
GREGORY H. WOODS
United States District Judge