Stein v. RealNetworks, Inc. et al

Filing 3

ORDER: Plaintiff led this case on October 4, 2022. Doc. 1. Since then, there has been no activity in this case. Plaintiff is advised that "[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is led, the courton motion or on it s own after notice to the plaintiffmust dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (emphasis added). Plaintiff is directed to serve the defendants by August 10, 2024. Failure to do so will result in dismissal. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 7/9/2024) (tro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHIVA STEIN, Plaintiff, – against – REALNETWORKS, INC., ROBERT GLASER, BRUCE A. JAFFE, CHRIS JONES, DAWN G. LEPORE, ERIK PRUSCH, MICHAEL B. SLADE, and TIM WAN, Defendants. ORDER 22-cv-8440 (ER) Ramos, D.J.: Plaintiff filed this case on October 4, 2022. Doc. 1. Since then, there has been no activity in this case. Plaintiff is advised that “[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (emphasis added). Plaintiff is directed to serve the defendants by August 10, 2024. Failure to do so will result in dismissal. It is SO ORDERED. Dated: July 9, 2024 New York, New York Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?