Cassava Sciences, Inc. v. Bredt et al
Filing
114
ORDER: On February 6, 2023, Plaintiff submitted its opposition to Defendants Bredt and Pitt's motion to dismiss the complaint. Dkt. No. 80. Plaintiff appended a table to its opposition as Appendix A, which it described as listing the allegedly defamatory statements published by Defendants Bredt and Pitt, excluding the allegedly defamatory statements originally published by other Defendants and republished by Defendants Bredt and Pitt. Dkt. No. 80. at 10. Plaintiff is directed to submit this table in native Excel format to the Court by February 8, 2024 by email. The chambers email address can be found on the Court's website. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 2/6/2024) (vfr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
----------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
CASSAVA SCIENCES, INC.,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-v –
:
:
DAVID BREDT, et al.,
:
Defendants. :
:
----------------------------------------------------------------- X
GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #: _________________
DATE FILED: 2/6/2024
1:22-cv-9409-GHW
ORDER
On February 6, 2023, Plaintiff submitted its opposition to Defendants Bredt and Pitt’s
motion to dismiss the complaint. Dkt. No. 80. Plaintiff appended a table to its opposition as
Appendix A, which it described as listing the allegedly defamatory statements published by
Defendants Bredt and Pitt, excluding the allegedly defamatory statements originally published by
other Defendants and republished by Defendants Bredt and Pitt. Dkt. No. 80. at 10.
Plaintiff is directed to submit this table in native Excel format to the Court by February
8, 2024 by email. The chambers email address can be found on the Court’s website.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 6, 2024
New York, New York
__________________________________
GREGORY H. WOODS
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?