Cassava Sciences, Inc. v. Bredt et al

Filing 114

ORDER: On February 6, 2023, Plaintiff submitted its opposition to Defendants Bredt and Pitt's motion to dismiss the complaint. Dkt. No. 80. Plaintiff appended a table to its opposition as Appendix A, which it described as listing the allegedly defamatory statements published by Defendants Bredt and Pitt, excluding the allegedly defamatory statements originally published by other Defendants and republished by Defendants Bredt and Pitt. Dkt. No. 80. at 10. Plaintiff is directed to submit this table in native Excel format to the Court by February 8, 2024 by email. The chambers email address can be found on the Court's website. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 2/6/2024) (vfr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------- X : CASSAVA SCIENCES, INC., : : Plaintiff, : : -v – : : DAVID BREDT, et al., : Defendants. : : ----------------------------------------------------------------- X GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: 2/6/2024 1:22-cv-9409-GHW ORDER On February 6, 2023, Plaintiff submitted its opposition to Defendants Bredt and Pitt’s motion to dismiss the complaint. Dkt. No. 80. Plaintiff appended a table to its opposition as Appendix A, which it described as listing the allegedly defamatory statements published by Defendants Bredt and Pitt, excluding the allegedly defamatory statements originally published by other Defendants and republished by Defendants Bredt and Pitt. Dkt. No. 80. at 10. Plaintiff is directed to submit this table in native Excel format to the Court by February 8, 2024 by email. The chambers email address can be found on the Court’s website. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 6, 2024 New York, New York __________________________________ GREGORY H. WOODS United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?