Zayas v. JLM Venture IV LLC et al

Filing 101

ORDER: Accordingly, the Court having been advised at Dkt. No. 95 that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and wi thout prejudice to the right to reopen the action within 30 days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline; any application to reopen filed the reafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be &quo t;so ordered" by the Court. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are cancelled. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Margaret M. Garnett on 6/3/2024) (mml)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 6/3/2024 EDWIN ZAYAS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, 22-CV-09872 (MMG) -against- ORDER JLM VENTURE IV LLC, et al., Defendants. MARGARET M. GARNETT, United States District Judge: On May 24, 2024, the Court ordered the parties to file a letter regarding the finalization of their settlement in principle (see Dkt. No. 95) and/or their settlement agreement should they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing the settlement agreement, no later than May 30, 2024. See Dkt. No. 100. To date, the parties have not filed such a letter or a settlement agreement. Accordingly, the Court having been advised at Dkt. No. 95 that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within 30 days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be “so ordered” by the Court. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are cancelled. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. Dated: June 3, 2024 New York, New York SO ORDERED. MARGARET M. GARNETT United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?