Golubovych v. Saks 5th Avenue, Inc.

Filing 101

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before March 7, 2025 at 5:30 PM Counsel forDefendant shall file a letter on the docket if Counsel has any concerns or questions regarding theCourt's disclosure.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before March 20, 2025 the parties shall file a jointletter on the docket advising the Court on the status, not substance, of any settlement negotiations and the parties' positions on the need for and timing of any Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 3/6/25) (yv)

USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 3/6/2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LARYSA V. GOLUBOVYCH,
Plaintiff,
1:22-cv-9923-MKV
-againstORDER
SAKS 5TH AVENUE, INC.,
Defendant.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:
The Court held a status conference in this action on March 5, 2025. At this conference the
Court disclosed knowing, in a limited professional capacity, Daniel Tabak who is newly
representing Plaintiff as pro bono counsel in this action. The Court made clear that this in no way
would impact the Court’s ability to preside over this action. Counsel for Defendant stated that
they had no concerns or question about the Court’s disclosure. The parties also discussed the
updated Civil Case Management Plan, including upcoming discovery deadlines and the parties’
positions on possible Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before March 7, 2025 at 5:30 PM Counsel for
Defendant shall file a letter on the docket if Counsel has any concerns or questions regarding the
Court’s disclosure.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before March 20, 2025 the parties shall file a joint
letter on the docket advising the Court on the status, not substance, of any settlement negotiations
and the parties’ positions on the need for and timing of any Alternative Dispute Resolution
mechanisms.
The parties are reminded that failure to comply with the Court’s orders or comply
with the FRCP, the Local Rules for the SDNY or this Court’s Individual Practice Rules, or

the parties discovery or other obligations thereunder may result in sanctions, including
monetary penalties on counsel and/or the parties, dismissal or preclusion of claims, defenses,
arguments, or evidence.
SO ORDERED.
_________________________________
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
United States District Judge

Date: March 6, 2025
New York, NY

2