Vuppala v. Enterprise 38 LLC et al

Filing 16

ORDER: On April 17, 2023, Defendant Enterprise 38 LLC ("Defendant") requested an extension of time to answer the Complaint and indicated that the parties had "reached a tentative agreement in principle" and that the parties were & quot;working to document that agreement." On May 17, 2023, Defendant answered the Complaint.No later than May 25, 2023, the parties shall file a joint letter on the docket updating the Court on the status of settlement discussions in this matter . In their letter, the parties shall indicate whether they seek referral to the district's court-annexed mediation program or to a magistrate judge, or, in the alternative, an initial pretrial conference with the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 5/18/2023) (ama)

Download PDF
Case 1:22-cv-09957-RA Document 16 Filed 05/18/23 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KIRAN VUPPALA, Plaintiff, v. 22-CV-9957 (RA) ENTERPRISE 38 LLC, d/b/a ENTERPRISE PARKING and MIDTOWN WEST B L.L.C., ORDER Defendants. RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: On April 17, 2023, Defendant Enterprise 38 LLC (“Defendant”) requested an extension of time to answer the Complaint and indicated that the parties had “reached a tentative agreement in principle” and that the parties were “working to document that agreement.” On May 17, 2023, Defendant answered the Complaint. No later than May 25, 2023, the parties shall file a joint letter on the docket updating the Court on the status of settlement discussions in this matter. In their letter, the parties shall indicate whether they seek referral to the district’s court-annexed mediation program or to a magistrate judge, or, in the alternative, an initial pretrial conference with the Court. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 18, 2023 New York, New York Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?