Binh Thanh Import Export Production & Trade Joint Stock Co. v. Amazon.com Services LLC
Filing
111
SCHEDULING ORDER ORDERED that this action will be placed in second place on the Court's July 2025 trial-ready calendar; the jury trial will begin on July 21, 2025, at 9:45 am or the Court's first available date thereafter. It is further,ORD ERED that the parties shall be ready to proceed on 24 hours' notice on or after July 21, 2025. It is further, ORDERED that in accordance with and as further provided in Individual Rule IV.B: (1) Any motions in limine shall be filed by May 2, 202 5. Responses to the motions shall be filed by May 14, 2025. No reply shall be filed. The parties shall follow the Court's Individual Rules regarding such motion. (2) Joint requests to charge, joint voir dire, joint verdict form and any memora ndum of law, as provided in the Court's individual rules, shall be filed by May 28, 2025. (3) The final pretrial order shall be filed June 4, 2025. (4) The final pretrial conference will be held June 30, 2025, at 2:00pm. The parties are encour aged to: (1) Contact Courtroom Deputy James Street at (212) 805-4553 closer to the trial date if they wish to know where they stand on this list. (2) Confer and consent to a trial before a Magistrate Judge (per the attached form) if they wish to ha ve a trial date certain or if they wish a different trial date. If a Magistrate Judge has overseen settlement discussions, the parties may request a different Magistrate Judge (to be randomly selected) as the trial judge. (3) Confer and advise the Court immediately by joint letter if they would like a referral to a Magistrate Judge or court appointed mediator for a settlement conference. Such referral will not stay the dates in this Order. (Motions due by 5/2/2025., Pretrial Order due by 6 /4/2025., Responses due by 5/14/2025, Ready for Trial by 7/21/2025., Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/30/2025 at 02:00 PM before Judge Lorna G. Schofield., Jury Trial set for 7/21/2025 at 09:45 AM before Judge Lorna G. Schofield.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 3/5/2025) (jca)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------X
:
BINH THANH IMPORT EXPORT
:
PRODUCTION & TRADE JOINT CO., D/B/A :
GILIMEX, INC.,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-against:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, D/B/A
:
:
AMAZON ROBOTICS ,
Defendant, :
------------------------------------------------------------ X
23 Civ. 292 (LGS)
SCHEDULING ORDER
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge:
WHEREAS this action is trial ready.
WHEREAS there is currently one case on the Court’s July 2025 trial-ready calendar. It is
hereby,
ORDERED that this action will be placed in second place on the Court’s July 2025 trialready calendar; the jury trial will begin on July 21, 2025, at 9:45 am or the Court’s first
available date thereafter. It is further,
ORDERED that the parties shall be ready to proceed on 24 hours’ notice on or after July
21, 2025. It is further,
ORDERED that in accordance with and as further provided in Individual Rule IV.B:
(1) Any motions in limine shall be filed by May 2, 2025. Responses to the motions
shall be filed by May 14, 2025. No reply shall be filed. The parties shall follow
the Court’s Individual Rules regarding such motion.
(2) Joint requests to charge, joint voir dire, joint verdict form and any memorandum
of law, as provided in the Court’s individual rules, shall be filed by May 28,
2025.
(3) The final pretrial order shall be filed June 4, 2025.
(4) The final pretrial conference will be held June 30, 2025, at 2:00pm.
* * * *
The parties are encouraged to:
(1) Contact Courtroom Deputy James Street at (212) 805-4553 closer to the trial date
if they wish to know where they stand on this list.
(2) Confer and consent to a trial before a Magistrate Judge (per the attached form) if
they wish to have a trial date certain or if they wish a different trial date. If a
Magistrate Judge has overseen settlement discussions, the parties may request a
different Magistrate Judge (to be randomly selected) as the trial judge.
(3) Confer and advise the Court immediately by joint letter if they would like a
referral to a Magistrate Judge or court appointed mediator for a settlement
conference. Such referral will not stay the dates in this Order.
Dated: March 5, 2025
New York, New York
AO 85 (Rev. 02/17) Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
v.
)
)
)
Defendant
)
)
Plaintiff
Civil Action No.
NOTICE, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Notice of a magistrate judge’s availability. A United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct
all proceedings in this civil action (including a jury or nonjury trial) and to order the entry of a final judgment. The judgment
may then be appealed directly to the United States court of appeals like any other judgment of this court. A magistrate judge
may exercise this authority only if all parties voluntarily consent.
You may consent to have your case referred to a magistrate judge, or you may withhold your consent without adverse
substantive consequences. The name of any party withholding consent will not be revealed to any judge who may otherwise
be involved with your case.
Consent to a magistrate judge’s authority. The following parties consent to have a United States magistrate judge
conduct all proceedings in this case including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings.
Printed names of parties and attorneys
Signatures of parties or attorneys
Dates
Reference Order
IT IS ORDERED: This case is referred to a United States magistrate judge to conduct all proceedings and
order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73.
Date:
District Judge’s signature
Printed name and title
Note:
Return this form to the clerk of court only if you are consenting to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States
magistrate judge. Do not return this form to a judge.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?