Liu v. Iconoclast Fitness, Inc. et al

Filing 46

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court is in receipt of a letter, filed by defense counsel, stating that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 45]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by Oct ober 24, 2024. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 10/24/2024.) (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 9/24/2024) (tg)

Download PDF
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 9/24/2024 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RACHAEL LIU, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, 23-cv-525 (MKV) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL ICONOCLAST FITNESS, INC. and NGO OKAFOR, Defendants. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter, filed by defense counsel, stating that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 45]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by October 24, 2024. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED. _________________________________ MARY KAY VYSKOCIL United States District Judge Date: September 24, 2024 New York, NY 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?