Dakten v. 165 Emmut Properties LLC et al

Filing 50

ORDER: On January 28, 2025, the Honorable Vernon S. Broderick assigned this matter to my docket for settlement. The parties are directed to email Courtroom Deputy Diljah Shaw at Diljah_Shaw@nysd.uscourts.gov with three mutually convenient date s to schedule a settlement conference. Due to the Court's busy calendar, settlement conferences must generally be scheduled at least six to eight weeks in advance. The Court will likely be unable to accommodate last-minute requests for settlement conferences, and the parties should not anticipate that litigation deadlines will be adjourned in response to late requests for settlement conferences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 1/29/2025) (mml)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X 1/29/2025 TENZIN DAKTEN, 23-CV-00639 (VSB)(SN) Plaintiff, ORDER -against165 EMMUT PROPERTIES LLC, et al., Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------------X SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: On January 28, 2025, the Honorable Vernon S. Broderick assigned this matter to my docket for settlement. The parties are directed to email Courtroom Deputy Diljah Shaw at Diljah_Shaw@nysd.uscourts.gov with three mutually convenient dates to schedule a settlement conference. Due to the Court’s busy calendar, settlement conferences must generally be scheduled at least six to eight weeks in advance. The Court will likely be unable to accommodate last-minute requests for settlement conferences, and the parties should not anticipate that litigation deadlines will be adjourned in response to late requests for settlement conferences. SO ORDERED. SARAH NETBURN United States Magistrate Judge DATED: January 29, 2025 New York, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?