Vollmer v. International Federation of Accountants et al
Filing
67
ORDER granting in part 66 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application granted in part. Plaintiff's application for an extension of time to file her opposition to Defendants' motion in limine, Dkt. No. 66, is granted. The de adline for Plaintiff to file her opposition to Defendants' motion in limine is extended to November 1, 2024. However, Defendants' reply, if any, is due no later than four days after Plaintiff files her opposition. See Dkt. No. 64. Plainti ff should not expect that the Court will grant further extensions of time to submit Plaintiff's pretrial materials. The Court hopes that the other attorneys on record representing Plaintiff, Mr. Tsenesidis and Mr. Stevenson, will be able to alleviate the burden on Mr. Marino. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 66. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 10/23/2024) (mml)
Justin Marino, Partner o: (212) 939-7228 f: (212) 531-6129
a: 2000 Deer Park Avenue, Deer Park, NY 11729
e: jmarino@stevensonmarino.com
October 23, 2024
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 10/23/24
VIA ECF
Hon. Judge Gregory H. Woods
U.S. District Court (SDNY)
Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007-1312
Re:
MEMORANDUM ENDORSED
Margaret Vollmer v. International Federation of Accountants, et al.
Civil Action No. 23-civ-00741 (GHW)
Dear Judge Woods:
We represent the Plaintiff in the above-referenced matter. We write to request
pursuant to Rule 1 (E) of Your Honor’s individual rules of practice for: (1) a seven (7)
day extension of time for Plaintiff to file its opposition to Defendants’ Motion in Limine,
which would extend the deadline from October 25 to and including November 1.
The reason for the request is that my wife has had sudden and unexpected lifethreatening medical issues, which included a major surgery on October 10, and an
emergency surgery on October 13-14 due to complications from the first surgery. I’ve
spent roughly a week in the hospital with her and every day by her bedside. While we
still do not have definitive pathology results from her tumor, I am optimistic that we can
prepare the appropriate response by November 1. If granted, Defendants’ reply would be
November 8. Granting this request would not affect any other deadlines.
This is the third request for the relief requested herein. Defendants’ counsel
consents to this request.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Justin R. Marino
Justin R. Marino
cc:
Defendants’ Counsel (via ECF)
Application granted in part. Plaintiff’s application for an extension of time to file her opposition to Defendants’ motion in limine, Dkt. No. 66, is
granted. The deadline for Plaintiff to file her opposition to Defendants’ motion in limine is extended to November 1, 2024. However, Defendants’
reply, if any, is due no later than four days after Plaintiff files her opposition. See Dkt. No. 64.
Plaintiff should not expect that the Court will grant further extensions of time to submit Plaintiff’s pretrial materials. The Court hopes that the other
attorneys on record representing Plaintiff, Mr. Tsenesidis and Mr. Stevenson, will be able to alleviate the burden on Mr. Marino.
The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 66.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 23, 2024
New York, New York
_____________________________________
GREGORY H. WOODS
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?