Reyes v. City of New York et al

Filing 69

ORDER denying as moot 66 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot. By October 16, 2024, Defendants shall either file an answer or file a new motion to dismiss. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 9/25/2024) (ks)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
DEQUAN REYES,
Plaintiff,
23-CV-1145 (DEH)

v.
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,

ORDER

Defendants.

DALE E. HO, United States District Judge:
On September 9, 2024, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution. See
ECF No. 66. On September 13, 2024, this Court granted Plaintiff’s request for an extension to
file his proposed Fourth Amended Complaint. See ECF No. 67. On September 23, 2024,
Plaintiff filed his Fourth Amended Complaint. See ECF No. 68. Accordingly, Defendants’
motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot. By October 16, 2024, Defendants shall either file an
answer or file a new motion to dismiss.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 25, 2024
New York, New York

DALE E. HO
United States District Judge