Joaquin et al v. New York Athletic Club
Filing
83
ORDER: The parties' application fails to attach any retainer agreement. On or before September 30, 2024, the parties are directed to file a letter attaching any such agreement. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 9/23/2024) (sgz)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------X
FRANKLIN JOAQUIN et al.,
:
Plaintiffs,
-v.-
:
ORDER
:
23 Civ. 1235 (GWG)
NEW YORK ATHLETIC CLUB,
:
Defendant.
:
---------------------------------------------------------------X
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Court’s Order of July 22, 2024 (Docket # 73) specifically required the parties to
attach a copy of any “retainer agreement” to their application pursuant to Cheeks v. Freeport
Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015), See generally Puerto v. Happy Life Home
Health Agency Inc., 704 F. Supp. 3d 403, 406 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) (judging reasonableness under
Cheeks of attorney fee request solely based on the percentage agreed to in the retainer
agreement).
The parties’ application fails to attach any retainer agreement. On or before September
30, 2024, the parties are directed to file a letter attaching any such agreement.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 23, 2024
New York, New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?